Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38164428›Full record

ArticleJournal of reproduction & infertility

Comparison of the Administration of 150 or 75

Roberto Matorras, Fermin Aspichueta, Begoña Prieto, Rosario Mendoza, Iker Malaina, Blanca Corral, Lorena Crisol, Alberto Vendrell, Antonia Exposito

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of reproduction & infertility. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 71% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Roberto MatorrasHuman Reproduction Unit, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain.
Fermin AspichuetaHuman Reproduction Unit, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain.
Begoña PrietoHuman Reproduction Unit, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain.
Rosario MendozaHuman Reproduction Unit, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain.
Iker MalainaDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of the Basque Country, Bizkaia, Spain.
Blanca CorralHuman Reproduction Unit, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain.
Lorena CrisolHuman Reproduction Unit, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain.
Alberto VendrellBiocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain.
Antonia ExpositoHuman Reproduction Unit, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain.
Hospital de Cruces · ESUniversity of the Basque Country · ESBioCruces Health research Institute · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The purpose of the study was to assess whether the coadministration of 150 Methods: In this study, two ovarian stimulation protocols coexisted which were identical except in the administered dose of recombinant LH, for which some patients received 150 Results: The number of retrieved oocytes was slightly higher in the 300/150 group (9.06±5.53 Conclusion: In women aged 35-39 undergoing ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH in agonist cycles, the coadministration of 75 or 150

Indexed as

Agonist ICSI cyclesCoadministrationLuteinizing hormoneOocyteOvarian stimulationPregnancy rate

Identifiers

PMID38164428
PMCPMC10757692
OpenAlexW4388994692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.