Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38164398›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023

The study on the impact of sex on the structure of gut microbiota of bamboo rats in China.

Yang Gan, Yan-Jun Wu, Yuan-Qiu Dong, Qian Li, Shu-Guang Wu, Yuan-Qing Jin, Tao-Feng Lu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yang Gan *Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China.
Yan-Jun Wu *Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China.
Yuan-Qiu DongGuizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China.
Qian LiGuizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China.
Shu-Guang WuGuizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China.
Yuan-Qing JinKaili Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Kaili, Guizhou, China.
Tao-Feng LuGuizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China.
Guiyang College of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNKaili University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Bamboo rats are rodents that eat bamboo, and their robust capacity for bamboo digestion is directly correlated with their gut flora. Chinese bamboo rat ( Methods: To study the microbiome differences of bamboo rats from different sexes, the microbial genomic DNA was extracted from each fecal sample and the V4 region of 16S rRNA genes was amplified and sequencing on an IlluminaHiSeq6000 platform. The operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were classified, the OTUs in different sexes was identified and compared at phylum and genus levels. For isolation and screening of cellulose degradation bacteria from bamboo rats, fresh feces from randomly selected bamboo rats were collected and used for the isolation and screening of cellulose degradation bacteria using Luria Bertani (LB) Agar medium containing Carboxymethyl cellulose. The cellulase activity, biochemical characterization and phylogenetic analysis of the purified bacteria strains were characterized. Results and discussion: A total of 3,833 OTUs were classified. The total microbial diversity detected in the female and male rats was 3,049 OTUs and 3,452 OTUs, respectively. The Shannon index revealed significant differences between the two groups (

Indexed as

16Sbamboo ratcellulases producing bacteriagendergut microbiome

Identifiers

PMID38164398
PMCPMC10757957
OpenAlexW4389886223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.