ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2023
Computed tomographic diaphragmatic thickness: a promising method for the evaluation of diaphragmatic muscle in cardiopulmonary diseased cats.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- M-Mode and Tissue Doppler Ultrasonographic Assessment of Diaphragmatic Function in Dogs With and Without Respiratory Distress.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Diaphragm thickness and ICU admission risk in elderly COVID-19 patients: a CT-based analysis.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diaphragmatic dysfunction (DD) is defined as a weakening of the diaphragmatic muscle and can be an undetected cause of dyspnea. The objectives of this study were to explore the appropriate diaphragmatic location, measure diaphragmatic thickness (DT), evaluate the effect of intrinsic factors on DT, and compare DT between healthy and diseased cats, using 33 healthy cats and 15 diseased cats. A retrospective, analytical, case-control study using thoraco-abdominal feline computed tomography (CT) was performed. Two radiologists independently reviewed all images to verify inter- and intra-observer reliabilities and the best position for measuring DT. The effects of sex, age, and body weight were also studied, and cutoff values for detecting DT abnormalities were established. The results showed that the appropriate location for DT measurement was at the ventral border of the cranial endplate of the first lumbar vertebral body (L1) due to its highest intra- and inter-observer reliabilities. At this location, a significant difference in DT between the right and left hemidiaphragms (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.