ArticleThe Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne2024
Trends in companion animal access to veterinary care in Canada, 2007 to 2020.
Article in The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding regulatory, structural, and relational barriers to offering accessible veterinary care: Results from a qualitative study of Canadian care providers.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2026Article
- How do accessible veterinary care providers evaluate programmes and engage communities? Results of a qualitative analysis of Canadian service providers.The Veterinary record · 2025Article
- Promoters and Detractors Identify Virtual Care as "Worlds Better than Nothing": A Qualitative Study of Participating Veterinarians' Perception of Virtual Care as a Tool for Providing Access.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Assess trends in access to veterinary care for companion animals in Canada. Procedure: Analysis and integration of available data, 2007 to 2020. Results: Cumulative growth in the Canadian veterinary workforce was 38%, and 49% for companion animal veterinarians. Clients per companion animal veterinarian decreased 30% from 2008 to 2020. Absolute client numbers increased 1.3%, compared to pet population growth of 17%. Medicalized pets (those that had received veterinary care in the past year) increased 25%, from 9.02 million in 2007 to 11.24 million in 2020. Non-medicalized pets increased 1.8%, from 4.48 million to 4.56 million. In 2007, 33% of pets were non-medicalized, compared to 29% (15% of dogs and 42% of cats) in 2020. There was a cumulative increase of 31% for total non-medicalized dogs, and a change of -5.6% for cats. Gross and net revenues per client increased by 99 and 112%, respectively, compared to cumulative inflation of 21%. Conclusion and clinical relevance: The analysis identified a large cohort of pets that had not received veterinary care each year. The trends were fewer clients per veterinarian, each paying higher veterinary costs, and suggested a relative, rather than absolute, veterinary capacity shortage overall. Accessible care-provision models must be encouraged, regulated for, and allowed to flourish alongside traditional models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38164387PMC10727154What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.