Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38164387›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne2024

Trends in companion animal access to veterinary care in Canada, 2007 to 2020.

Philip J H Nichols, Karen A Ward, Kyrsten J Janke, Linda S Jacobson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Philip J H NicholsToronto Humane Society, 11 River Street, Toronto, Ontario M5A 4C2.
Karen A WardToronto Humane Society, 11 River Street, Toronto, Ontario M5A 4C2.
Kyrsten J JankeToronto Humane Society, 11 River Street, Toronto, Ontario M5A 4C2.
Linda S JacobsonToronto Humane Society, 11 River Street, Toronto, Ontario M5A 4C2.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Assess trends in access to veterinary care for companion animals in Canada. Procedure: Analysis and integration of available data, 2007 to 2020. Results: Cumulative growth in the Canadian veterinary workforce was 38%, and 49% for companion animal veterinarians. Clients per companion animal veterinarian decreased 30% from 2008 to 2020. Absolute client numbers increased 1.3%, compared to pet population growth of 17%. Medicalized pets (those that had received veterinary care in the past year) increased 25%, from 9.02 million in 2007 to 11.24 million in 2020. Non-medicalized pets increased 1.8%, from 4.48 million to 4.56 million. In 2007, 33% of pets were non-medicalized, compared to 29% (15% of dogs and 42% of cats) in 2020. There was a cumulative increase of 31% for total non-medicalized dogs, and a change of -5.6% for cats. Gross and net revenues per client increased by 99 and 112%, respectively, compared to cumulative inflation of 21%. Conclusion and clinical relevance: The analysis identified a large cohort of pets that had not received veterinary care each year. The trends were fewer clients per veterinarian, each paying higher veterinary costs, and suggested a relative, rather than absolute, veterinary capacity shortage overall. Accessible care-provision models must be encouraged, regulated for, and allowed to flourish alongside traditional models.

Indexed as

PetsVeterinariansAnimalsCanadaDogsHumans

Identifiers

PMID38164387
PMCPMC10727154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.