Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38164290›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2023

Natural language processing for the automated detection of intra-operative elements in lumbar spine surgery.

Sayan Biswas, Lareyna McMenemy, Ved Sarkar, Joshua MacArthur, Ella Snowdon, Callum Tetlow, K Joshi George

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Large Language Models in Spine Surgery: A Promising Technology.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sayan Biswas *Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Lareyna McMenemy *Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Ved SarkarCollege of Letters and Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Joshua MacArthurFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Ella SnowdonFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Callum TetlowDivision of Data Science, The Northern Care Alliance NHS Group, Manchester, United Kingdom.
K Joshi GeorgeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom.
University of Manchester · GBBerkeley College · USNorthern Health and Social Care Trust · GBSalford Royal Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to develop natural language processing (NLP) algorithms to conduct automated identification of incidental durotomy, wound drains, and the use of sutures or skin clips for wound closure, in free text operative notes of patients following lumbar surgery. Methods: A single-centre retrospective case series analysis was conducted between January 2015 and June 2022, analysing operative notes of patients aged >18 years who underwent a primary lumbar discectomy and/or decompression at any lumbar level. Extreme gradient-boosting NLP algorithms were developed and assessed on five performance metrics: accuracy, area under receiver-operating curve (AUC), positive predictive value (PPV), specificity, and Brier score. Results: A total of 942 patients were used in the training set and 235 patients, in the testing set. The average age of the cohort was 53.900 ± 16.153 years, with a female predominance of 616 patients (52.3%). The models achieved an aggregate accuracy of >91%, a specificity of >91%, a PPV of >84%, an AUC of >0.933, and a Brier score loss of ≤0.082. The decision curve analysis also revealed that these NLP algorithms possessed great clinical net benefit at all possible threshold probabilities. Global and local model interpretation analyses further highlighted relevant clinically useful features (words) important in classifying the presence of each entity appropriately. Conclusions: These NLP algorithms can help monitor surgical performance and complications in an automated fashion by identifying and classifying the presence of various intra-operative elements in lumbar spine surgery.

Indexed as

clipsdural tearsnatural language processingspine surgerysutureswound drains

Identifiers

PMID38164290
PMCPMC10757971
OpenAlexW4389895512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.