Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38164261›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2023

What helps the helpers? Resilience and risk factors for general and profession-specific mental health problems in psychotherapists during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Matthias Zerban, Lara Marie Christine Puhlmann, Dana Lassri, Peter Fonagy, P Read Montague, Natalia Kiselnikova, Nicolas Lorenzini, Alex Desatnik, Raffael Kalisch, Tobias Nolte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Matthias Zerban *Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.
Lara Marie Christine Puhlmann *Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany.
Dana Lassri *Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Peter Fonagy *Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
P Read Montague *Virginia Tech Carilion Fralin Biomedical Research Institute, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Roanoke, VA, United States.
Natalia Kiselnikova *Department of Psychosocial Studies, Birkbeck College, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Nicolas Lorenzini *Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Alex Desatnik *Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Raffael Kalisch *Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.
Tobias NolteResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Although the COVID-19 pandemic has severely affected wellbeing of at-risk groups, most research on resilience employed convenience samples. We investigated psychosocial resilience and risk factors (RFs) for the wellbeing of psychotherapists and other mental health practitioners, an under-researched population that provides essential support for other at-risk groups and was uniquely burdened by the pandemic. Method: We examined 18 psychosocial factors for their association with resilience, of which four were chosen due to their likely relevance specifically for therapists, in a cross-sectional multi-national sample ( Results: Factors previously identified as RFs in other populations, including perceived social support, optimism and self-compassion, were almost all significant in the study population (SR Discussion: Our work identifies psychosocial RFs for mental health practitioners' wellbeing during crisis. Most identified factors are general, in that they are associated with resilience to a wider range of mental health problems, and global, in that they have also been observed in other populations and stressor constellations.

Indexed as

adversitycompassion satisfactionmental health practitionersmental health professionalsmentalizingpositive reappraisalself-compassionstress

Identifiers

PMID38164261
PMCPMC10757941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.