ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2023
Serum neurofilament light chain levels in patients with cognitive deficits and movement disorders: comparison of cerebrospinal and serum neurofilament light chain levels with other biomarkers.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Serum neurofilament light chain in response to probiotics in bi-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial (CleverAge Biota).Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia · 2025Trial
- Chitinase-3-Like 1 Protein (CHI3L1) Levels in Patients With Cognitive Deficits and Movement Disorders: Comparison With Other Biomarkers.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- Association of frailty and serum neurofilament light chain levels: the mediating role of estimated glomerular filtration rate.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Serum neurofilament light chain (S NfL) is a non-specific marker of neuronal damage, including Alzheimer's disease (AD). We aimed to verify the reference interval (RI) of serum NfL using a highly sensitive ELISA, and to estimate the optimal cut-off value for neuronal damage. Our second objective was to compare NfL in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum (S) with the routine neurodegeneration biomarkers used in AD, and to assess their concentrations relative to the degree of cognitive deficit. Methods: Samples from 124 healthy volunteers were used to estimate the S NfL RI. For the comparison study, we used CSF and S samples from 112 patients with cognitive disorders. Cognitive functions were assessed using the mini-mental state examination. ELISA assays were used to determine the CSF and S NfL levels, CSF β-amyloid peptide Results: The estimated RI of S NfL were 2.25-9.19 ng.L Conclusion: Our results suggested that NfL and tTau in CSF of patients with cognitive decline could be replaced by the less-invasive determination of S NfL using a highly sensitive ELISA method. S NfL reflected the severity of cognitive deficits assessed by mini-mental state examination (MMSE). However, S NfL is not specific to AD and does not appear to be a suitable biomarker for early diagnosis of AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.