Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38163917›Full record

ArticleGlobal health research and policy2024

Integrated health reporting within the UN architecture: learning from maternal, newborn and child health.

Svetlana Akselrod, Téa Collins, Daria Berlina, Amy Collins, Luke Allen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health research and policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Svetlana AkselrodWHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Téa CollinsWHO, Geneva, Switzerland. collinst@who.int.
Daria BerlinaWHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Amy CollinsWHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Luke AllenWHO, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2750-3575

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite a proliferation of the United Nations General Assembly high-level meetings on a range of health issues and developmental challenges, global funding continues to flow disproportionately to HIV and maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH). Using the experience of MNCH, this short article argues that successful human rights framing and the development of robust and regular reporting mechanisms in the international development architecture has contributed to these areas receiving attention. Taking non-communicable diseases (NCDs) as an example of a relatively neglected health area, we propose mechanisms that would improve integrated reporting of health issues in a way that aligns with the move toward cross-cutting themes and matching political and financial commitments with impact. As new frameworks are being developed to support multi-agency approaches to achieving SDG 3-including reporting and accountability-there are opportunities to ensure MNCH and NCDs jointly seek data collection measures that can support specific targets and indicators that link NCDs with early childhood development.

Indexed as

Child HealthNoncommunicable DiseasesChildChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolData CollectionGlobal HealthHumansInfant, NewbornUnited NationsGlobal healthHealth governanceHealth policyMaternal and child healthSustainable development goalsUnited Nations

Identifiers

PMID38163917
PMCPMC10759695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.