Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38163514›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2024

Retrieval augmentation of large language models for lay language generation.

Yue Guo, Wei Qiu, Gondy Leroy, Sheng Wang, Trevor Cohen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. RARE: Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning Enhancement for Large Language Models.Proceedings of the conference. Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. From statistics to deep learning: Using large language models in psychiatric research.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2025
    Review
  9. Feasibility of Automated Precharting using GPT-4 in New Specialty Referrals.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. README: Bridging Medical Jargon and Lay Understanding for Patient Education through Data-Centric NLP.Findings of ACL. EMNLP. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · 2024
    Article
  13. APPLS: Evaluating Evaluation Metrics for Plain Language Summarization.Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yue GuoBiomedical and Health Informatics, University of Washington, United States of America. Electronic address: yguo50@uw.edu.
Wei QiuPaul G. Allen School of Computer Science, University of Washington, United States of America.
Gondy LeroyManagement Information Systems, University of Arizona, United States of America.
Sheng WangPaul G. Allen School of Computer Science, University of Washington, United States of America.
Trevor CohenBiomedical and Health Informatics, University of Washington, United States of America.

Funding

Professional to Plain Language Neural Translation: A Path Toward Actionable Health InformationR21LM013934 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI COHEN, TREVOR · 2022 to 2023
$402k
NLM NIH HHS R21 LM013934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The complex linguistic structures and specialized terminology of expert-authored content limit the accessibility of biomedical literature to the general public. Automated methods have the potential to render this literature more interpretable to readers with different educational backgrounds. Prior work has framed such lay language generation as a summarization or simplification task. However, adapting biomedical text for the lay public includes the additional and distinct task of background explanation: adding external content in the form of definitions, motivation, or examples to enhance comprehensibility. This task is especially challenging because the source document may not include the required background knowledge. Furthermore, background explanation capabilities have yet to be formally evaluated, and little is known about how best to enhance them. To address this problem, we introduce Retrieval-Augmented Lay Language (RALL) generation, which intuitively fits the need for external knowledge beyond that in expert-authored source documents. In addition, we introduce CELLS, the largest (63k pairs) and broadest-ranging (12 journals) parallel corpus for lay language generation. To evaluate RALL, we augmented state-of-the-art text generation models with information retrieval of either term definitions from the UMLS and Wikipedia, or embeddings of explanations from Wikipedia documents. Of these, embedding-based RALL models improved summary quality and simplicity while maintaining factual correctness, suggesting that Wikipedia is a helpful source for background explanation in this context. We also evaluated the ability of both an open-source Large Language Model (Llama 2) and a closed-source Large Language Model (GPT-4) in background explanation, with and without retrieval augmentation. Results indicate that these LLMs can generate simplified content, but that the summary quality is not ideal. Taken together, this work presents the first comprehensive study of background explanation for lay language generation, paving the path for disseminating scientific knowledge to a broader audience. Our code and data are publicly available at: https://github.com/LinguisticAnomalies/pls_retrieval.

Indexed as

LanguageNatural Language ProcessingInformation Storage and RetrievalLinguisticsUnified Medical Language SystemBackground explanationLarge language modelsLay language summaryRetrieval-augmented modelText generation

Identifiers

PMID38163514
PMCPMC10874606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.