ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2024
Retrieval augmentation of large language models for lay language generation.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comprehensive review of intelligent question-answering systems in traditional Chinese medicine based on LLMs.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2026Review
- Large Language Models in Critical Care Medicine: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- RARE: Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning Enhancement for Large Language Models.Proceedings of the conference. Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · 2025Article
- Deep Learning in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Trends.MedComm · 2025Review
- Retrieval augmented generation for large language models in healthcare: A systematic review.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Clinical insights: A comprehensive review of language models in medicine.PLOS digital health · 2025Review
- Thyro-GenAI: A Chatbot Using Retrieval-Augmented Generative Models for Personalized Thyroid Disease Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- From statistics to deep learning: Using large language models in psychiatric research.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2025Review
- Feasibility of Automated Precharting using GPT-4 in New Specialty Referrals.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025Article
- Coherence and comprehensibility: Large language models predict lay understanding of health-related content.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2025Article
- A fine-tuning enhanced RAG system with quantized influence measure as AI judge.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- README: Bridging Medical Jargon and Lay Understanding for Patient Education through Data-Centric NLP.Findings of ACL. EMNLP. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · 2024Article
- APPLS: Evaluating Evaluation Metrics for Plain Language Summarization.Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · 2024Article
- Leveraging artificial intelligence to summarize abstracts in lay language for increasing research accessibility and transparency.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- Article
- A GPT-based EHR modeling system for unsupervised novel disease detection.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2024Article
- A Narrative Review on the Application of Large Language Models to Support Cancer Care and Research.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2024Review
- Year 2023 in Biomedical Natural Language Processing: a Tribute to Large Language Models and Generative AI.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2024Article
- Integrating Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Large Language Models in Nephrology: Advancing Practical Applications.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- FAVOR-GPT: a generative natural language interface to whole genome variant functional annotations.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The complex linguistic structures and specialized terminology of expert-authored content limit the accessibility of biomedical literature to the general public. Automated methods have the potential to render this literature more interpretable to readers with different educational backgrounds. Prior work has framed such lay language generation as a summarization or simplification task. However, adapting biomedical text for the lay public includes the additional and distinct task of background explanation: adding external content in the form of definitions, motivation, or examples to enhance comprehensibility. This task is especially challenging because the source document may not include the required background knowledge. Furthermore, background explanation capabilities have yet to be formally evaluated, and little is known about how best to enhance them. To address this problem, we introduce Retrieval-Augmented Lay Language (RALL) generation, which intuitively fits the need for external knowledge beyond that in expert-authored source documents. In addition, we introduce CELLS, the largest (63k pairs) and broadest-ranging (12 journals) parallel corpus for lay language generation. To evaluate RALL, we augmented state-of-the-art text generation models with information retrieval of either term definitions from the UMLS and Wikipedia, or embeddings of explanations from Wikipedia documents. Of these, embedding-based RALL models improved summary quality and simplicity while maintaining factual correctness, suggesting that Wikipedia is a helpful source for background explanation in this context. We also evaluated the ability of both an open-source Large Language Model (Llama 2) and a closed-source Large Language Model (GPT-4) in background explanation, with and without retrieval augmentation. Results indicate that these LLMs can generate simplified content, but that the summary quality is not ideal. Taken together, this work presents the first comprehensive study of background explanation for lay language generation, paving the path for disseminating scientific knowledge to a broader audience. Our code and data are publicly available at: https://github.com/LinguisticAnomalies/pls_retrieval.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.