Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38163239›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Building loss assessment using deep learning algorithm from typhoon Rusa.

Ji-Myong Kim, Junseo Bae, Manik Das Adhikari, Sang-Guk Yum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ji-Myong KimDepartment of Architectural Engineering, Mokpo National University, Mokpo, 58554, South Korea.
Junseo BaeDivision of Smart Cities, Korea University, Sejong, 30019, South Korea.
Manik Das AdhikariDepartment of Civil Engineering, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung, 25457, South Korea.
Sang-Guk YumDepartment of Civil Engineering, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung, 25457, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate crises such as extreme weather events, natural disasters and climate change caused by climate transformations are causing much damage worldwide enough to be called a climate catastrophe. The private sector and the government across industries are making every effort to prevent and limit the increasing damage, but the results have yet to meet market demand. Therefore, this study proposes a method that uses a deep learning algorithm to predict the damage caused by typhoons. Model development is based on a Deep Neural Network (DNN) algorithm, and learning data is obtained by fine-tuning the network structure and hyperparameters; the amount of damage caused by Typhoon Rusa was known as training data. The constructed DNN model underwent evaluation and validation by computation of mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE). Furthermore, a comparative analysis was conducted to confirm the applicability of the proposed framework against a traditional multi-regression model to ensure the model's accuracy and resilience. Finally, this study offers a novel approach to predicting typhoon damage using advanced deep-learning techniques. Subsequently, government disaster management officials, facility managers, and insurance companies can utilize this method to accurately predict the extent of damage caused by typhoons. Preventive actions such as improved risk assessment, expanded insurance companies, and enhanced disaster responses plans can be implemented using these outcomes. Ultimately, the proposed model will help to reduce typhoon damage and strengthen general resilience to climate crises.

Indexed as

Climate changeDeep learning algorithmExtreme weather eventsTyphoon RusaWet typhoon

Identifiers

PMID38163239
PMCPMC10756996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.