ArticleHeliyon2024
Development and psychometric properties of the age-friendly hospitals scale in older adults.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determining elderly-friendly radiation oncology clinics: a comparative analysis of accessibility and transport, physical environment, and privacy aspects (TROD 013 - 005).BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Evaluating older adults' satisfaction with age-friendly hospitals services: insights from an Eastern Taiwan regional teaching hospital.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Age-friendly Primary Health Care by the World Health Organization (WHO) provided a framework to guide countries in developing concrete and appropriate care in the health system, including encouraging the development of an Age-Friendly Hospital (AFH) care network. The study aimed to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of the AFH scale (AFHS) in older adults. A cross-sectional study collected and analyzed data from 330 older adults between June 2018 and June 2019. The instrument was developed and validated according to the proposed guidelines. The study involved item generation and scale development, including content and face validity, pilot testing, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. EFA was performed using principal axis factoring with a promax rotation. The original model of four factors and 22 items was conducted. Three factors with eigenvalues greater than one were extracted, and the scree plot examination confirmed the retention of three factors with 22 items after performing EFA. Using the EFA, we identified three main factors: care processes, communication and service, and physical environment. The developed scale can contribute to establishing AFH and quality healthcare institutions. It may be a valuable reference for healthcare facilities to evaluate and enhance their services, considering factors like limited resources and workforce. Furthermore, this scale can facilitate continuous improvement and long-term development of age-friendly healthcare institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.