ArticleHeliyon2024
Quality equivalence and in-vitro antibiotic activity test of different brands of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid tablets in Mwanza, Tanzania: A cross sectional study.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microwave-synthesized NiZrO3 Biotech · 2025Article
- The comparison of the quality of selected brands of antibiotics in Tanzania sourced from different geographical regions.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2024Article
- Bioactivities of Mangrove-Associated Filamentous Fungi from Jepara, Indonesia: Anti-Bacterial Metabolites and Wood-Degrading Enzymes.Avicenna journal of medical biotechnologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Each film coated tablet of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid contains 500 mg of amoxicillin as an active pharmaceutical ingredient and 125 mg of clavulanic acid. Different brands have the same active ingredients but different excipients, which may cause differences in efficacy. With the emergence of generic antibiotics post-patent expiration, the antibiotic activity of generics is in question in comparison to the innovator. This study aims at determining the pharmaceutical quality and in-vitro antimicrobial activity of different brands of amoxicillin/clavulanate. Method: ology: The study was a cross-sectional laboratory-based experimental study conducted at the TMDA (Tanzania Medicines and Medical Devices Authority) Lake Zone laboratory and the CUHAS Microbiology Laboratory from in May 2021. The study samples were four brands of amoxicillin/clavulanate and sixty archived isolates, thirty of which were Results: All tablets samples complied with the British pharmacopeia (BP) specifications, however sixty archived isolates which were tested in this study showed resistance towards the standard AMC disc (68 %). The innovator brand (AC1) showed significant mean difference from 2 out of 3 generics (p-values <0.05) while the first generic brand (AC2) showed significant superiority among the generics. Conclusion: Thus, the four samples that were used all complied with the specifications according to BP on dissolution and assay tests but there was an overall resistance towards amoxicillin/clavulanate, and this was moreover seen by generic brands in comparison to the innovator which proved to be of superior activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.