Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38163175›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

Forest fire surveillance systems: A review of deep learning methods.

Azlan Saleh, Mohd Asyraf Zulkifley, Hazimah Haspi Harun, Francis Gaudreault, Ian Davison, Martin Spraggon

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Azlan SalehDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering & Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), 43600 UKM, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
Mohd Asyraf ZulkifleyDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering & Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), 43600 UKM, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
Hazimah Haspi HarunDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering & Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), 43600 UKM, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
Francis GaudreaultRabdan Academy, 65, Al Inshirah, Al Sa'adah, Abu Dhabi, 22401, PO Box: 114646, United Arab Emirates.
Ian DavisonRabdan Academy, 65, Al Inshirah, Al Sa'adah, Abu Dhabi, 22401, PO Box: 114646, United Arab Emirates.
Martin SpraggonRabdan Academy, 65, Al Inshirah, Al Sa'adah, Abu Dhabi, 22401, PO Box: 114646, United Arab Emirates.
National University of Malaysia · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review aims to critically examine the existing state-of-the-art forest fire detection systems that are based on deep learning methods. In general, forest fire incidences bring significant negative impact to the economy, environment, and society. One of the crucial mitigation actions that needs to be readied is an effective forest fire detection system that are able to automatically notify the relevant parties on the incidence of forest fire as early as possible. This review paper has examined in details 37 research articles that have implemented deep learning (DL) model for forest fire detection, which were published between January 2018 and 2023. In this paper, in depth analysis has been performed to identify the quantity and type of data that includes images and video datasets, as well as data augmentation methods and the deep model architecture. This paper is structured into five subsections, each of which focuses on a specific application of deep learning (DL) in the context of forest fire detection. These subsections include 1) classification, 2) detection, 3) detection and classification, 4) segmentation, and 5) segmentation and classification. To compare the model's performance, the methods were evaluated using comprehensive metrics like accuracy, mean average precision (mAP), F1-Score, mean pixel accuracy (MPA), etc. From the findings, of the usage of DL models for forest fire surveillance systems have yielded favourable outcomes, whereby the majority of studies managed to achieve accuracy rates that exceeds 90%. To further enhance the efficacy of these models, future research can explore the optimal fine-tuning of the hyper-parameters, integrate various satellite data, implement generative data augmentation techniques, and refine the DL model architecture. In conclusion, this paper highlights the potential of deep learning methods in enhancing forest fire detection that is crucial for forest fire management and mitigation.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligence and deep learningForest fireForest preservation

Identifiers

PMID38163175
PMCPMC10754902
OpenAlexW4389279575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.