ArticleHeliyon2024
Determining optimal bead central angle by applying machine learning to wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM).
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A co-registered in-situ and ex-situ dataset from wire arc additive manufacturing process.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) is being extensively used in various industrial fields. In WAAM, if a bead is deposited without considering the central angle, its shape may collapse with increasing number of layers. To address this problem, a new method for optimizing the bead geometry using a support vector machine (SVM) classifier was established in this study. The ranges of the optimal deposition conditions were determined using the SVM classifier and verified by experiments. Geometric data of deposited beads were extracted using a laser profiler, and an SVM binary classifier was used to predict suitable ranges of the deposition conditions. Data were extracted through 20 single-layer basic experiments, classification was performed based on 4°, and the appropriateness of SVM classification was found through 8 single-layer and 3 multi-layer verification experiments. The results showed that the SVM classifier successfully selected the ranges of the optimal deposition conditions. Verification experiments revealed that the results in all cases were appropriately classified based on the boundary of the classification line. Moreover, the SVM classifier was efficient even when a small amount of input data was available. The contribution of this study is that the developed method can help build desired bead geometries in scenarios where deposition is required in the WAAM process, such as re-manufacturing. Thus, this method can be used in real-world industrial applications through further research on the bead shape with multi-layer deposition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.