ArticleHeliyon2024
PaCMAP-embedded convolutional neural network for multi-omics data integration.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond Histology: A Unified Transcriptomic Atlas Defines Lung Cancer Biologic States and Subtypes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Explainable graph learning for multimodal single-cell data integration.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence Algorithms and Their Current Role in the Identification and Comparison of Gleason Patterns in Prostate Cancer Histopathology: A Comprehensive Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Navigating Challenges and Opportunities in Multi-Omics Integration for Personalized Healthcare.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Prostate Cancer Diagnosis via Visual Representation of Tabular Data and Deep Transfer Learning.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Elucidating Cancer Subtypes by Using the Relationship between DNA Methylation and Gene Expression.Genes · 2024Article
- A framework for block-wise missing data in multi-omics.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: The multi-omics data integration has emerged as a prominent avenue within the healthcare industry, presenting substantial potential for enhancing predictive models. The main motivation behind this study stems from the imperative need to advance prognostic methodologies in cancer diagnosis, an area where precision is pivotal for effective clinical decision-making. In this context, the present study introduces an innovative methodology that integrates copy number alteration (CNA), DNA methylation, and gene expression data. Methods: The three omics data were successfully merged into a two-dimensional (2D) map using the PaCMAP dimensionality reduction technique. Utilizing the RGB coloring scheme, a visual representation of the integration was produced utilizing the values of the three omics of each sample. Then, the colored 2D maps were fed into a convolutional neural network (CNN) to forecast the Gleason score. Results: Our proposed model outperforms the cutting-edge i-SOM-GSN model by integrating multi-omics data and the CNN architecture with an accuracy of 98.89, and AUC of 0.9996. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of multi-omics data integration in predicting health outcomes. The proposed methodology, combining PaCMAP for dimensionality reduction, RGB coloring for visualization, and CNN for prediction, offers a comprehensive framework for integrating heterogeneous omics data and improving predictive accuracy. These findings contribute to the advancement of personalized medicine and have the potential to aid in clinical decision-making for prostate cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.