Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38163076›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023

Rumen and fecal microbiomes are related to diet and production traits in

Liliane Costa Conteville, Juliana Virginio da Silva, Bruno Gabriel Nascimento Andrade, Tainã Figueiredo Cardoso, Jennifer Jessica Bruscadin, Priscila Silva Neubern de Oliveira, Gerson Barreto Mourão, Luiz Lehmann Coutinho, Julio Cesar Pascale Palhares, Alexandre Berndt and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Liliane Costa ContevilleEmbrapa Southeast Livestock, São Carlos, Brazil.
Juliana Virginio da SilvaEmbrapa Southeast Livestock, São Carlos, Brazil.
Bruno Gabriel Nascimento AndradeComputer Science Department, Munster Technological University, Cork, Ireland.
Tainã Figueiredo CardosoEmbrapa Southeast Livestock, São Carlos, Brazil.
Jennifer Jessica BruscadinEmbrapa Southeast Livestock, São Carlos, Brazil.
Priscila Silva Neubern de OliveiraEmbrapa Southeast Livestock, São Carlos, Brazil.
Gerson Barreto MourãoDepartment of Animal Science, Center for Functional Genomics, University of São Paulo/ESALQ, Piracicaba, Brazil.
Luiz Lehmann CoutinhoDepartment of Animal Science, Center for Functional Genomics, University of São Paulo/ESALQ, Piracicaba, Brazil.
Julio Cesar Pascale PalharesEmbrapa Southeast Livestock, São Carlos, Brazil.
Alexandre BerndtEmbrapa Southeast Livestock, São Carlos, Brazil.
Sergio Raposo de MedeirosEmbrapa Southeast Livestock, São Carlos, Brazil.
Luciana Correia de Almeida RegitanoEmbrapa Southeast Livestock, São Carlos, Brazil.
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BRUniversidade Federal de São Carlos · BRMethodist University of Piracicaba · BRMunster Technological University · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ruminants harbor a complex microbial community within their gastrointestinal tract, which plays major roles in their health and physiology. Brazil is one of the largest producers of beef in the world and more than 90% of the beef cattle herds are composed of pure and crossbred Nelore ( Results: The ruminal microbiome exhibited significantly higher microbial diversity, distinctive taxonomic profile and variations in microbial functionality compared to the fecal microbiome, highlighting the distinct contributions of the microbiomes of these environments. Animals subjected to different dietary treatments exhibited significant differences in their microbiomes' archaeal diversity and in the abundance of 89 genera, as well as in the functions associated with the metabolism of components of each diet. Moreover, depending on the diet, feed-efficient animals and low methane emitters displayed higher microbial diversity in their fecal microbiome. Multiple genera were associated with an increase or decrease of the phenotypes. Upon analyzing the functions attributed to these taxa, we observed significant differences on the ruminal taxa associated with feed efficient and inefficient cattle. The ruminal taxa that characterized feed efficient cattle stood out for having significantly more functions related to carbohydrate metabolism, such as monosaccharides, di-/oligosaccharides and amino acids. The taxa associated with methane emission had functions associated with methanogenesis and the production of substrates that may influence methane production, such as hydrogen and formate. Conclusion: Our findings highlight the significant role of diet in shaping Nelore microbiomes and how its composition and functionality may affect production traits such as feed efficiency and methane emission. These insights provide valuable support for the implementation of novel feeding and biotechnological strategies.

Indexed as

agricultural by-productsBos indicusfeed efficiencymethane productionresidual feed intakeresidual methane emissionshotgun metagenomic sequencing

Identifiers

PMID38163076
PMCPMC10754987
OpenAlexW4389785965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.