Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38163007›Full record

ArticleBladder (San Francisco, Calif.)2023

Global status quo and trends of research on urinary incontinence: a bibliometric and visualized study.

Teng Li, Yuqing Li, Song Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Teng LiDepartment of Urology, South China Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518111, China.
Yuqing LiDepartment of Urology, South China Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518111, China.
Song WuDepartment of Urology, South China Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518111, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Urinary incontinence (UI) is highly prevalent and poses a considerable social and economic burden on both victims and the society at large. This study reviewed the UI-related literature to present the current status and predict future trends of UI researh. Methods: Studies related to UI published between 2012 and 2022 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection. The bibliometric analysis and visualized study were performed by using VOSviewer. Results: A total of 3092 publications were retrieved for further analysis. The United States ranked the first in terms of the total number of publications, citations, the H-index of publications. The institutions with the most cited publications was the N8 Research Partnership. Conclusions: This study indicated that the UI research is more intensive in Europe and North America,

Indexed as

bibliometricsincontinenceneurourologyUrinary incontinencevisualized analysis

Identifiers

PMID38163007
PMCPMC10754693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.