ReviewTremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.)2023
Electrophysiology in Functional Movement Disorders: An Update.
Review in Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emergent technologies in clinical neurophysiology to study the neuromuscular system: IFCN handbook chapter.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2026Review
- Current Opinions and Practices in Functional Neurological Disorders: A Survey of Indian Neurologists.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology · 2025Article
- Functional Movement Disorder: Evolving Mechanisms, Diagnostic Precision, and Personalized Multidisciplinary Care.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2025Review
- Tremor in Pediatric Populations: Clinical Characteristics, Differential Diagnosis, and Management Challenges.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2025Review
- Orthodontic considerations for managing patients with functional movement disorders: a narrative review and clinical guide.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Functional movement disorders (FMD) are a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge, both to the neurologist and psychiatrists. The phenomenology is varied and can present as tremors, dystonia, jerks/myoclonus, gait disorder, other abnormal movements or a combination. There has been an increase in the use of electrophysiological studies that are an important tool in the evaluation of FMDs. Methods: We searched the database platforms of MEDLINE, Google scholar, Web of Sciences, Scopus using the Medical Subject Heading terms (MeSH) for all the articles from 1st January 1970 till November 2022. A total of 658 articles were obtained by the search mechanism. A total of 79 relevant articles were reviewed thoroughly, of which 26 articles that had electrophysiological data were included in the present review. Results: Variability, distractibility and entertainability can be demonstrated in functional tremors by using multichannel surface electromyography. Voluntary ballistic movements tend to decrease the tremor, while loading the tremulous limb with weight causes the tremor amplitude to increase in functional tremor. Presence of Bereitschaftspotential demonstrates the functional nature of palatal tremor and myoclonus. Co-contraction testing may be helpful in differentiating functional from organic dystonia. The R2 blink reflex recovery cycle has been found to be abnormally enhanced in organic blepharospasm, whereas it is normal in presumed functional blepharospasm. Plasticity is found to be abnormally high in organic dystonia and normal in functional dystonia, in addition to enhanced facilitation in patients with organic dystonia. Conclusions: Electrophysiological tests supplement clinical examination and helps in differentiating FMD from organic movement disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.