Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38162881›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023

Sex-related difference in the retinal structure of young adults: a machine learning approach.

Flávia Monteiro Farias, Railson Cruz Salomão, Enzo Gabriel Rocha Santos, Andrew Sousa Caires, Gabriela Santos Alvarez Sampaio, Alexandre Antônio Marques Rosa, Marcelo Fernandes Costa, Givago Silva Souza

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Flávia Monteiro FariasInstituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Brazil.
Railson Cruz SalomãoNúcleo de Medicina Tropical, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Brazil.
Enzo Gabriel Rocha SantosInstituto de Ciências Exatas e Naturais, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Brazil.
Andrew Sousa CairesInstituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Brazil.
Gabriela Santos Alvarez SampaioInstituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Brazil.
Alexandre Antônio Marques RosaInstituto de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Brazil.
Marcelo Fernandes CostaDepartamento de Psicologia, Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Givago Silva SouzaInstituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Pará · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the accuracy of machine learning (ML) algorithms to classify the sex of the participant from retinal thickness datasets in different retinal layers. Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 26 male and 38 female subjects. Data were acquired using HRA + OCT Spectralis, and the thickness and volume of 10 retinal layers were quantified. A total of 10 features were extracted from each retinal layer. The accuracy of various algorithms, including k-nearest-neighbor, support vector classifier, logistic regression, linear discriminant analysis, random forest, decision tree, and Gaussian Naïve Bayes, was quantified. A two-way ANOVA was conducted to assess the ML accuracy, considering both the classifier type and the retinal layer as factors. Results: A comparison of the accuracies achieved by various algorithms in classifying participant sex revealed superior results in datasets related to total retinal thickness and the retinal nerve fiber layer. In these instances, no significant differences in algorithm performance were observed ( Conclusion: The current research highlights the distinctive potential of various retinal layers in sex classification. Different layers and ML algorithms yield distinct accuracies. The RF algorithm's consistent superiority suggests its effectiveness in identifying sex-related features from a range of retinal layers.

Indexed as

machine learningmacularetinaretinal thicknesssex-related differences

Identifiers

PMID38162881
PMCPMC10755955
OpenAlexW4389728768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.