ArticleJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences2023
Evaluation of the level of integration of the dental curriculum in Umm Al-Qura University.
Article in Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The FHJ debate: Dental health is so crucial that it should be in the medical school curriculum.Future healthcare journal · 2026Article
- Student perspectives on integrating basic and clinical dental sciences: insights from three dental schools in Norway.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
- Orofacial Pain and Temporomandibular Disorders Education at Umm Al-Qura University: Perceptions and Curriculum Improvement Recommendations.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To identify the models and levels of integration of the undergraduate dental curriculum in Umm Al-Qura University in KSA. This comprehensive evaluation and analysis of the current dental curriculum will facilitate better planning for curriculum reform, thus improving the quality of dental education. Methods: All courses were evaluated by three reviewers who independently checked the most recent course specifications forms (2021) to extract data relating to course descriptions and contents. A model of integration was identified for each course (using a modified Harden's integration ladder). Courses and their relative weighting (by credit hours) were mapped to the level of integration by years, departments, course classification, and educational methods. The overall pattern of curriculum integration was then determined. Results: All courses exhibited some level of integration to varying degrees throughout years and across departments. The most frequently used model is the nested model of integration. The overall pattern of curriculum integration is low to moderate. Highly integrated courses are only taught during the second and final years and are managed by the Departments of Basic Oral Sciences and Restorative Dentistry. Clinical courses represent 44.3% of the curriculum although only 26.6% of clinical courses have a high level of integration. Problem-based learning/case-based learning (PBL/CBL) and clinical training strategies are mostly applied in moderately to highly integrated courses, although PBL/CBL is the least used educational method throughout the curriculum. Conclusion: All courses exhibited some level of integration with an overall low to moderate pattern. More collaborative planning and working between departments are recommended to increase the level of integration of courses throughout different academic years. In addition, modern educational strategies such as PBL/CBL and blended learning should be implemented more in our dental curriculum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.