Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38162866›Full record

ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2023

Diagnostic usefulness of deep learning methods for

Daesung Kang, Kayoung Lee, Jinseung Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daesung KangDepartment of Healthcare Information Technology Inje University Gimhae Republic of Korea.
Kayoung LeeDepartment of Family medicine, Busan Paik Hospital Inje University College of Medicine Busan Republic of Korea.
Jinseung KimDepartment of Family medicine, Busan Paik Hospital Inje University College of Medicine Busan Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5526-9707

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: We aimed to assess the diagnostic potential of deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) for detecting Methods: We categorized a total of 13,071 images of various gastric sub-areas and employed five pretrained DCNN architectures: ResNet-101, Xception, Inception-v3, InceptionResnet-v2, and DenseNet-201. Additionally, we created an ensemble model by combining the output probabilities of the best models. We used images of different sub-areas of the stomach for training and evaluated the performance of our models. The diagnostic metrics assessed included area under the curve (AUC), specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Results: When training included images from all sub-areas of the stomach, our ensemble model demonstrated the highest AUC (0.867), with specificity at 78.44%, accuracy at 80.28%, positive predictive value at 82.66%, and negative predictive value at 77.37%. Significant differences were observed in AUC between the ensemble model and the individual DCNN models. When training utilized images from each sub-area separately, the AUC values for the antrum, cardia and fundus, lower body greater curvature and lesser curvature, and upper body greater curvature and lesser curvature regions were 0.842, 0.826, 0.718, and 0.858, respectively, when the ensemble model was used. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that the DCNN model, designed for automated image analysis, holds promise for the evaluation and diagnosis of

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningHelicobacter pylori

Identifiers

PMID38162866
PMCPMC10757494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.