Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38162833›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2023

Fitting a collider in a quantum computer: tackling the challenges of quantum machine learning for big datasets.

Miguel Caçador Peixoto, Nuno Filipe Castro, Miguel Crispim Romão, Maria Gabriela Jordão Oliveira, Inês Ochoa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Miguel Caçador PeixotoLIP-Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas, Escola de Ciências, Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Nuno Filipe CastroLIP-Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas, Escola de Ciências, Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Miguel Crispim RomãoLIP-Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas, Escola de Ciências, Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Maria Gabriela Jordão OliveiraLIP-Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas, Escola de Ciências, Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Inês OchoaLIP-Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current quantum systems have significant limitations affecting the processing of large datasets with high dimensionality, typical of high energy physics. In the present paper, feature and data prototype selection techniques were studied to tackle this challenge. A grid search was performed and quantum machine learning models were trained and benchmarked against classical shallow machine learning methods, trained both in the reduced and the complete datasets. The performance of the quantum algorithms was found to be comparable to the classical ones, even when using large datasets. Sequential Backward Selection and Principal Component Analysis techniques were used for feature's selection and while the former can produce the better quantum machine learning models in specific cases, it is more unstable. Additionally, we show that such variability in the results is caused by the use of discrete variables, highlighting the suitability of Principal Component analysis transformed data for quantum machine learning applications in the high energy physics context.

Indexed as

data reductionhigh energy physicsK-meansprincipal component analysisquantum computingquantum machine learning

Identifiers

PMID38162833
PMCPMC10755015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.