Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38162803›Full record

ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology2024

Traditional suture tape versus multiple high-strength sutures for augmentation of anterior cruciate ligament primary repair: A time-zero biomechanical study.

Thun Itthipanichpong, Puchong Kulrat, Danaithep Limskul, Thanathep Tanpowpong, Chanyaphan Virulsri, Pairat Tangpornprasert, Somsak Kuptniratsaikul, Napatpong Thamrongskulsiri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thun ItthipanichpongDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.
Puchong KulratDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.
Danaithep LimskulDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.
Thanathep TanpowpongDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chanyaphan VirulsriCenter of Excellence for Prosthetic and Orthopedic Implant, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pairat TangpornprasertCenter of Excellence for Prosthetic and Orthopedic Implant, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Somsak KuptniratsaikulDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.
Napatpong ThamrongskulsiriDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/objective: During the initial stages of rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery, a pivotal role is played in ensuring effective recuperation and averting complications. An often-employed strategy to tackle ACL laxity during this period involves the incorporation of synthetic materials for reinforcement. The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of conventional suture tape and multiple high-strength sutures as augmentation techniques for ACL repair. Methods: Ten preserved cadaveric knees embalmed using the Thiel method were segregated into two groups, each containing five knees. In one group, traditional suture tape was employed for augmentation, while the other group utilized multiple high-strength sutures. Each knee underwent a cyclic load of 1000 sine wave cycles, succeeded by an axial distraction load until failure ensued. The resultant displacement and ultimate load at failure were assessed to contrast the efficacy of the two augmentation techniques. Results: The group utilizing multiple high-strength sutures exhibited a significantly higher load to failure at time-zero (1690.7 N) compared to the suture tape group (987.6 N) (P = .003). Furthermore, the multiple high-strength sutures group demonstrated significantly reduced displacement after 1000 cyclic loads (6.6 mm) in comparison to the suture tape group (16.3 mm) (P < .001). Conclusions: Multiple high-strength sutures show better biomechanical properties for the augmentation of ACL repair at time-zero. Both suture tape and multiple high-strength sutures had ultimate load-to-failure values higher than the natural ACL loads. Therefore, these substances might serve as augmentation options to prevent the ACL's gradual elongation, a critical concern particularly in the initial stages of rehabilitation.

Indexed as

Anterior cruciate ligament repairHigh-strength sutureInternal braceSuture tapeSynthetic augmentation

Identifiers

PMID38162803
PMCPMC10755459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.