Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38162705›Full record

ArticleThe journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM

Drivers of Well-Being and Burnout in Anesthesiology Residents.

Michael Tan, Jeanine A Naegle, Christy K Boscardin, Denise P Chang, Joyce M Chang, Kristina R Sullivan, Jina L Sinskey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michael TanThe following authors are in the Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care at the University of California, San Francisco, CA: is an Anesthesiology Resident; is an Assistant Professor; and are Associate Professors; is a Professor; is a Professor and is also in the Department of Medicine. is a Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology Fellow in the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
Jeanine A NaegleThe following authors are in the Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care at the University of California, San Francisco, CA: is an Anesthesiology Resident; is an Assistant Professor; and are Associate Professors; is a Professor; is a Professor and is also in the Department of Medicine. is a Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology Fellow in the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
Christy K BoscardinThe following authors are in the Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care at the University of California, San Francisco, CA: is an Anesthesiology Resident; is an Assistant Professor; and are Associate Professors; is a Professor; is a Professor and is also in the Department of Medicine. is a Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology Fellow in the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
Denise P ChangThe following authors are in the Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care at the University of California, San Francisco, CA: is an Anesthesiology Resident; is an Assistant Professor; and are Associate Professors; is a Professor; is a Professor and is also in the Department of Medicine. is a Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology Fellow in the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
Joyce M ChangThe following authors are in the Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care at the University of California, San Francisco, CA: is an Anesthesiology Resident; is an Assistant Professor; and are Associate Professors; is a Professor; is a Professor and is also in the Department of Medicine. is a Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology Fellow in the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
Kristina R SullivanThe following authors are in the Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care at the University of California, San Francisco, CA: is an Anesthesiology Resident; is an Assistant Professor; and are Associate Professors; is a Professor; is a Professor and is also in the Department of Medicine. is a Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology Fellow in the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
Jina L SinskeyThe following authors are in the Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care at the University of California, San Francisco, CA: is an Anesthesiology Resident; is an Assistant Professor; and are Associate Professors; is a Professor; is a Professor and is also in the Department of Medicine. is a Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology Fellow in the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, CA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: With more than 50% of anesthesiology residents reporting burnout, many residency programs have begun creating wellness programs to address burnout and promote well-being. However, to date, many wellness initiatives have focused on individual strategies rather than systems approaches to improve the learning environment. Individual-focused interventions in the absence of systematic efforts can lead to resentment, resistance, and worsening burnout and precipitate a loss of trust in leadership and the organization. Here, we describe a process to engage anesthesiology residents, who are key stakeholders, by exploring their perspectives on burnout and well-being to better inform systematic interventions to improve the clinical work and learning environments. Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews with second- and third-year clinical anesthesia residents at the University of California, San Francisco, using the areas of worklife model as sensitizing concepts. We conducted a thematic analysis on transcribed interviews grounded in constructivist orientation. Results: We identified the following 3 major categories of themes based on interviews with 10 residents: (1) definition of well-being, (2) challenges to well-being, and (3) strategies for coping with challenges and burnout. Challenges described by anesthesiology residents align with the areas of the worklife model, with the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic precipitating additional threats in the domains of workload and community. Conclusions: Anesthesiology residents' definition of well-being includes both individual (resilience) and systemic (meaning in work, job autonomy, and control) factors, reaffirming that positive work and learning environments are critical to professional well-being.

Indexed as

resident educationWell-being

Identifiers

PMID38162705
PMCPMC10753163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.