Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38162620›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Strategies for the implementation of the living guidelines for cochlear implantation in adults.

Ángel Ramos-Macías, Leo De Raeve, Meredith Holcomb, Ella Connor, Aiya Taylor, Irene Deltetto, Colman Taylor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Facilitators of Clinical Guideline Implementation in Tertiary Care: A Systematic Literature Review.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Ángel Ramos-MacíasDepartment of Otolaryngology, School of Medicine, University of Las Palmas, Las Palmas, Spain.
Leo De RaeveIndependent Information and Research Centre on Cochlear Implants (ONICI), European Association of Cochlear Implant Users (EURO-CIU) and Cochlear Implant International Community of Action (CIICA), Zonhoven, Belgium.
Meredith HolcombDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Miami Miller, School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Ella ConnorHTANALYSTS, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Aiya TaylorCritical Care, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Irene DeltettoHTANALYSTS, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Colman TaylorHTANALYSTS, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
New South Wales Department of Health · AUCochlear (Australia) · AUThe George Institute for Global Health · AUUniversidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria · ESUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Clinical guidelines for cochlear implants (CI) exist in several countries, however, they lack consistency and often do not encompass the full user journey. This study aims to explore the barriers and facilitators for implementing global Living Guidelines for cochlear implantation in adults with severe, profound or moderate sloping to profound sensorineural hearing loss (SPSNHL) as well as identify guideline implementation (GI) tools that may support uptake. Methods: A convenience sample of Task Force members were recruited for semi-structured interviews. Interview transcripts were thematically analysed to group country-specific barriers, facilitators and GI tools into three levels: health care provider (HCP), consumer and structural. Once identified, barriers and facilitators were classified into four themes related to awareness, economic, guideline or other. Results: Interviews were conducted with 38 Task Force members, representing 20 countries. Lack of CI and hearing loss awareness was a major barrier at the HCP (85% of countries), consumer (80%) and structural (20%) levels. Economic and guideline barriers followed at the HCP (35%; 25%), consumer (45%; 0%) and structural (55%; 30%) levels, respectively. Facilitators focused on raising awareness of hearing loss and CIs as well as guideline related initiates at the HCP (80%; 70%), consumer (70%; 10%) and structural (25%; 70%) levels. GI tools including education, economic evaluations, quick reference resources and social media can help improve awareness and uptake. Conclusion: Awareness is the primary barrier to implementing Living Guidelines globally for adults with SPSNHL. Endorsement from key professional bodies and using the best available evidence can enhance uptake.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationHearing LossAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisGuideline AdherenceHealth PersonnelHumanscochlear implantationguideline implementation strategiesguideline implementation toolshearing lossliving guidelines

Identifiers

PMID38162620
PMCPMC10757841
OpenAlexW4389786090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.