Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38162531›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2024

Frailty assessment tools in the emergency department: A geriatric emergency department guidelines 2.0 scoping review.

Lisa A Wolf, Alexander X Lo, Peter Serina, Anita Chary, Jiraporn Sri-On, Kalpana Shankar, Ellen Sano, Shan W Liu

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Screening and Interventions for Elder Mistreatment: Geriatric Emergency Department Guidelines 2.0 Systematic Review.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Understanding frailty screening of older adults in the emergency department: A survey of emergency physicians in Ontario.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Frailty at the interface of resilience and intrinsic capacity].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Lisa A WolfEmergency Nurses Association Schaumburg Illinois USA.
Alexander X LoDepartment of Emergency Medicine Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago Illinois USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1869-2776
Peter SerinaDepartment of Emergency Medicine Brown University Providence Rhode Island USA.
Anita CharyDepartment of Emergency Medicine Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas USA.
Jiraporn Sri-OnDepartment of Emergency Medicine Vajira Hospital Bangkok Thailand.
Kalpana ShankarDepartment of Emergency Medicine Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA.
Ellen SanoDepartment of Emergency Medicine Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons New York New York USA.
Shan W LiuDepartment of Emergency Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5602-3717
Baylor College of Medicine · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USBrown University · USColumbia University · USEmergency Nurses Association · USHarvard University · USNorthwestern University · USVajira Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Given the aging population and growing burden of frailty, we conducted this scoping review to describe the available literature regarding the use and impact of frailty assessment tools in the assessment and care of emergency department (ED) patients older than 60 years. Methods: A search was made of the available literature using the Covidence system using various search terms. Inclusion criteria comprised peer-reviewed literature focusing on frailty screening tools used for a geriatric population (60+ years of age) presenting to EDs. An additional search of PubMed, EBSCO, and CINAHL for articles published in the last 5 years was conducted toward the end of the review process (January 2023) to search specifically for literature describing interventions for frailty, yielding additional articles for review. Exclusion criteria comprised articles focusing on an age category other than geriatric and care environments outside the emergency care setting. Results: A total of 135 articles were screened for inclusion and 48 duplicates were removed. Of the 87 remaining articles, 20 were deemed irrelevant, leaving 67 articles for full-text review. Twenty-eight were excluded for not meeting inclusion criteria, leaving 39 full-text studies. Use of frailty screening tools were reported in the triage, care, and discharge decision-making phases of the ED care trajectory, with varying reports of usefulness for clinical decision-making. Conclusion: The literature reports tools, scales, and instruments for identifying frailty in older patients at ED triage; multiple frailty scores or tools exist with varying levels of utilization. Interventions for frailty directed at the ED environment were scant. Further research is needed to determine the usefulness of frailty identification in the context of emergency care, the effects of care delivery interventions or educational initiatives for front-line medical professionals on patient-oriented outcomes, and to ensure these initiatives are acceptable for patients.

Identifiers

PMID38162531
PMCPMC10755799
OpenAlexW4390405782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.