Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38162304›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

Prediction of additive, epistatic, and dominance effects using models accounting for incomplete inbreeding in parental lines of hybrid rye and sugar beet.

Peter Skov Kristensen, Pernille Sarup, Dario Fé, Jihad Orabi, Per Snell, Linda Ripa, Marius Mohlfeld, Thinh Tuan Chu, Joakim Herrström, Ahmed Jahoor and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Crop wild relative populations of Beta vulgaris as source for genome-wide association mapping of complex traits.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Scald resistance in hybrid rye (Frontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter Skov KristensenCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Pernille SarupResearch and Development, Nordic Seed A/S, Odder, Denmark.
Dario FéResearch Division, DLF Seeds A/S, Store Heddinge, Denmark.
Jihad OrabiResearch and Development, Nordic Seed A/S, Odder, Denmark.
Per SnellResearch and Development, DLF Beet Seed AB, Landskrona, Sweden.
Linda RipaResearch and Development, DLF Beet Seed AB, Landskrona, Sweden.
Marius MohlfeldBreeding, Nordic Seed Germany GmbH, Nienstädt, Germany.
Thinh Tuan ChuCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Joakim HerrströmResearch and Development, DLF Beet Seed AB, Landskrona, Sweden.
Ahmed JahoorResearch and Development, Nordic Seed A/S, Odder, Denmark.
Just JensenCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DKDLF Trifolium (Denmark) · DKSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic models for prediction of additive and non-additive effects within and across different heterotic groups are lacking for breeding of hybrid crops. In this study, genomic prediction models accounting for incomplete inbreeding in parental lines from two different heterotic groups were developed and evaluated. The models can be used for prediction of general combining ability (GCA) of parental lines from each heterotic group as well as specific combining ability (SCA) of all realized and potential crosses. Here, GCA was estimated as the sum of additive genetic effects and within-group epistasis due to high degree of inbreeding in parental lines. SCA was estimated as the sum of across-group epistasis and dominance effects. Three models were compared. In model 1, it was assumed that each hybrid was produced from two completely inbred parental lines. Model 1 was extended to include three-way hybrids from parental lines with arbitrary levels of inbreeding: In model 2, parents of the three-way hybrids could have any levels of inbreeding, while the grandparents of the maternal parent were assumed completely inbred. In model 3, all parental components could have any levels of inbreeding. Data from commercial breeding programs for hybrid rye and sugar beet was used to evaluate the models. The traits grain yield and root yield were analyzed for rye and sugar beet, respectively. Additive genetic variances were larger than epistatic and dominance variances. The models' predictive abilities for total genetic value, for GCA of each parental line and for SCA were evaluated based on different cross-validation strategies. Predictive abilities were highest for total genetic values and lowest for SCA. Predictive abilities for SCA and for GCA of maternal lines were higher for model 2 and model 3 than for model 1. The implementation of the genomic prediction models in hybrid breeding programs can potentially lead to increased genetic gain in two different ways: I) by facilitating the selection of crossing parents with high GCA within heterotic groups and II) by prediction of SCA of all realized and potential combinations of parental lines to produce hybrids with high total genetic values.

Indexed as

Gca and scagenomic selectiongrain yieldheterotic groupshybrid breedinginbreedingnon-additive genetic effectsroot yield

Identifiers

PMID38162304
PMCPMC10756082
OpenAlexW4388275053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.