Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38162278›Full record

ReviewJournal of hip preservation surgery

Proximal femoral derotation osteotomy for management of femoral malversion: a systematic review.

Mark Sohatee, Monketh Jaibaji, Ajay Malviya

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of hip preservation surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mark SohateeThe Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol North Road, Northfield, Birmingham B31 2AP, UK.
Monketh JaibajiHealth Education England North East, Waterfront 4 Goldcrest Way, Newburn, Riverside, Newcastle upon Tyne NE15 8NY, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2944-337X
Ajay MalviyaDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Woodhorn Lane, Ashington, Northumberland NE63 9JJ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8053-1853
Health Education North West · GBNorthumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust · GBRoyal Orthopaedic Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Femoral malversion is an under-recognized contributor to hip pain in younger adults. Under treatment is often a contributor to poor outcomes in hip preservation surgery. We reviewed the literature to analyse the outcomes of proximal femoral derotation osteotomy as a treatment for femoral malversion as well as propose our own management algorithm for treating such patients. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines searching four databases (PubMed, CINALH, MEDLINE and EMBASE) for studies investigating the outcomes of derotation osteotomy in treating malversion. Nine studies were found encompassing 229 hips. At a mean follow-up of 39.9 months across the studies, there were only two conversions (1%) to total hip arthroplasty and four revision cases in total. Seven of the nine studies reported improved functional outcomes in their cohorts, with the mean Harris hip score improved from 63.7 to 87.3 where reported. There is a paucity of literature around the outcomes of proximal femoral derotation osteotomy. However, both the evidence available and the authors' experience suggest that consideration of femoral malversion is an essential component of hip preservation surgery, improving functional outcomes in cases of excessive femoral anteversion and femoral retroversion.

Identifiers

PMID38162278
PMCPMC10757403
OpenAlexW4386067254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.