Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38162259›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2024

Evaluation of an early-stage prototype polyurethane femoral head implant for hip arthroplasty.

Nad Siroros, Ricarda Merfort, Filippo Migliorini, Sophie Lecouturier, Sophia Leven, Maximilian Praster, Frank Hildebrand, Jörg Eschweiler

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Nad SirorosDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medical Center RWTH Aachen, Germany.
Ricarda MerfortDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medical Center RWTH Aachen, Germany.
Filippo MiglioriniDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medical Center RWTH Aachen, Germany.
Sophie LecouturierDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medical Center RWTH Aachen, Germany.
Sophia LevenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medical Center RWTH Aachen, Germany.
Maximilian PrasterDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medical Center RWTH Aachen, Germany.
Frank HildebrandDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medical Center RWTH Aachen, Germany.
Jörg EschweilerDepartment of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Hospital Bergmannstrost, Halle (Saale), Germany.
RWTH Aachen University · DEBG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle · DEChiang Mai University · THOspedale di Bolzano · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Thi study evalautes a new bone-preserving femoral head cover that mimics the articular cartilage of the femoral head. Methods: A specially developed polyurethane (PU) was evaluated in biocompatibility (cytotoxicity test) and mechanical response to tensile loading. In the cytotoxicity test, steam sterilized (SS) and ethylene oxide sterilized (EtO) PU samples were incubated separately in a cell culture medium. The seeded cell line MG-63 was then added to these sample-incubated cell culture mediums. One negative control group and one positive control group were also evaluated. The cells in each group were cultured for seven days before being quantified using the alamarBlue assay. In the mechanical test, the femoral head cover implants were separated into three groups of three samples. Each group represented a different implant insertion idea: direct insertion ( Results: The cytotoxicity test results show no significant difference in fluorescence intensity between the negative control, the three SS groups, and one EtO group (P > 0.05). However, the other two EtO groups exhibit significantly lower fluorescence intensity compared with the negative control (P < 0.05). In the mechanical test, the Conclusion: The cytotoxicity test and the mechanical experiment provide initial assessments of the proposed PU femoral head cover implant. The evaluation outcomes of this study could serve as a foundation for developing more functional design and testing methods, utilizing numerical simulations, and developing animal/clinical trials in the future.

Indexed as

BearingsHip arthroplastyImplantPolyurethane

Identifiers

PMID38162259
PMCPMC10755531
OpenAlexW4389118080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.