Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38162183›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2023

Progress in methods for evaluating Schwann cell myelination and axonal growth in peripheral nerve regeneration via scaffolds.

Jue Ling, Chang He, Shuxuan Zhang, Yahong Zhao, Meifeng Zhu, Xiaoxuan Tang, Qiaoyuan Li, Liming Xu, Yumin Yang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jue LingKey Laboratory of Neuroregeneration, Ministry of Education and Jiangsu Province, Co-Innovation Center of Tissue Engineering and Nerve Injury Repair, Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Chang HeKey Laboratory of Neuroregeneration, Ministry of Education and Jiangsu Province, Co-Innovation Center of Tissue Engineering and Nerve Injury Repair, Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Shuxuan ZhangKey Laboratory of Neuroregeneration, Ministry of Education and Jiangsu Province, Co-Innovation Center of Tissue Engineering and Nerve Injury Repair, Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Yahong ZhaoKey Laboratory of Neuroregeneration, Ministry of Education and Jiangsu Province, Co-Innovation Center of Tissue Engineering and Nerve Injury Repair, Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Meifeng ZhuCollege of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Xiaoxuan TangKey Laboratory of Neuroregeneration, Ministry of Education and Jiangsu Province, Co-Innovation Center of Tissue Engineering and Nerve Injury Repair, Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Qiaoyuan LiKey Laboratory of Neuroregeneration, Ministry of Education and Jiangsu Province, Co-Innovation Center of Tissue Engineering and Nerve Injury Repair, Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Liming XuInstitute of Medical Device Control, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China.
Yumin YangKey Laboratory of Neuroregeneration, Ministry of Education and Jiangsu Province, Co-Innovation Center of Tissue Engineering and Nerve Injury Repair, Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Nantong University · CNNankai University · CNNational Institutes for Food and Drug Control · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) is a neurological disorder caused by trauma that is frequently induced by accidents, war, and surgical complications, which is of global significance. The severity of the injury determines the potential for lifelong disability in patients. Artificial nerve scaffolds have been investigated as a powerful tool for promoting optimal regeneration of nerve defects. Over the past few decades, bionic scaffolds have been successfully developed to provide guidance and biological cues to facilitate Schwann cell myelination and orientated axonal growth. Numerous assessment techniques have been employed to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of nerve scaffolds in promoting the growth of Schwann cells and axons upon the bioactivities of distinct scaffolds, which have encouraged a greater understanding of the biological mechanisms involved in peripheral nerve development and regeneration. However, it is still difficult to compare the results from different labs due to the diversity of protocols and the availability of innovative technologies when evaluating the effectiveness of novel artificial scaffolds. Meanwhile, due to the complicated process of peripheral nerve regeneration, several evaluation methods are usually combined in studies on peripheral nerve repair. Herein, we have provided an overview of the evaluation methods used to study the outcomes of scaffold-based therapies for PNI in experimental animal models and especially focus on Schwann cell functions and axonal growth within the regenerated nerve.

Indexed as

natural polymernerve regenerationneurotrophic factorsperipheral nerve injurySchwann cell

Identifiers

PMID38162183
PMCPMC10755477
OpenAlexW4389515349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.