Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38162177›Full record

ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2023

Clinical Impact of Pre-Existing Autoantibodies in Patients With SCLC Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study.

Yuki Sato, Satoru Fujiwara, Akito Hata, Yoko Kida, Takahiro Masuda, Hisanori Amimoto, Hirotaka Matsumoto, Kotoko Miyoshi, Kojiro Otsuka, Keisuke Tomii

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yuki SatoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Satoru FujiwaraDepartment of Neurology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Akito HataDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Kobe Minimally Invasive Cancer Center, Kobe, Japan.
Yoko KidaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Kobe City Nishi-Kobe Medical Center, Kobe, Japan.
Takahiro MasudaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Kobe City Nishi-Kobe Medical Center, Kobe, Japan.
Hisanori AmimotoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Kobe City Medical Center West Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Hirotaka MatsumotoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center, Amagasaki, Japan.
Kotoko MiyoshiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Shinko Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Kojiro OtsukaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Shinko Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Keisuke TomiiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital · JPKobe City Nishi-Kobe Medical Center · JPShinko Hospital · JPHyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center · JPKobe City Medical Center West Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Although pretreatment autoantibodies have been associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment efficacy in some types of cancer, their importance has not been evaluated in patients with SCLC. Methods: A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted on a total of 52 patients with extensive-disease SCLC who received immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy as the first-line treatment at either of the six participating centers in Japan. Pretreatment serum samples were collected and analyzed for autoantibodies (rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibodies, and antithyroid). Moreover, 12 antineuronal antibodies (AMPH, CV2, PNMA2, Ri, Yo, Hu, Recoverin, SOX1, Titin, Zic4, GAD65, and Tr) were analyzed using immunoblot assays. The primary end point was the incidence of irAEs with or without autoantibodies. The secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) on the basis of the presence or absence of autoantibodies. Results: PFS and OS were 4.4 and 25.3 months, respectively. Autoantibodies (rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibodies, and antithyroid antibodies) were detected in 29 patients (56%). In total, irAEs were observed in 18 patients (35%); irAE incidence was 48% in the autoantibody-positive group and 17% in the autoantibody-negative group ( Conclusions: Vigilance is required against the development of irAEs in pretreatment antibody-positive patients.

Indexed as

AutoantibodyImmune-related adverse eventParaneoplastic autoantibodyParaneoplastic neurologic syndromeSmall-cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID38162177
PMCPMC10755358
OpenAlexW4388802688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.