ReviewCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2023
Evidence-based frozen elephant trunk practice: a narrative review.
Review in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical outcomes of hybrid surgery in the treatment of aortic arch disease: a retrospective study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Contemporary Management of the Aortic Arch: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Arch-First Technique for Extensive Thoracic Aortic Replacement: A Case Series of Patients With Complex Thoracic Aortic Disease.The American journal of case reports · 2026Article
- Aortic Arch and Frozen Elephant Trunk Surgery: Anesthetic Challenges and Strategies for Organ Protection.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Unanticipated stenosis of the distal edge of frozen elephant trunk caused by retrograde perfusion: A case report.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery cases · 2025Article
- From back table innovation to contemporary application: a review of the frozen elephant trunk technique.Annals of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Review
- The Frozen Elephant Trunk Procedure-8 Years of Experience from Poland.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Long-term outcomes of frozen elephant trunk for aortic dissection: a single-center experience.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: The frozen elephant trunk (FET) allows a single-stage repair of complex arch pathologies due to its stented and non-stented hybrid prosthesis (HP) features. FET inherently has its own related complications including distal stent graft-induced new entry (dSINE), failure of aortic remodelling, endoleak, reintervention, and kinking of the stent. The aim of this narrative review is to discuss the latest evidence regarding the postoperative clinical outcomes of the FET procedure. Another aim is to provide an overview of results achieved using different FET devices on the global arch prostheses market. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using multiple electronic databases to identify and extract the relevant data and information. Key Content and Findings: This review found that the literature reported a 5-12% mortality rate post-FET, with varying figures depending on the prosthesis type. Between 0-18.2% of patients developed dSINE, while 0.1-28% developed endoleak. Reintervention occurred in 0-28% of patients and the incidence of kinking has been quoted between 0-8% in the literature. Reporting aortic remodelling rates was challenging due to the lack of standardisation and various measurements reported; however, all studies included in this review reported relative increase in true lumen diameter, reduction in the false lumen diameter, and/or false lumen thrombosis. Conclusions: In conclusion, FET can achieve a favourable postoperative profile in terms of survival, complications and aortic remodelling, and remains the gold-standard treatment for thoracic aortic pathologies implicating the arch and descending thoracic aorta.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.