Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38161989›Full record

ArticleVaccine: X2023

COVID-19 vaccination and infection among people with self-reported chronic health conditions and disabilities vs. people without medical risk factors in a survey sample from Oslo.

Jessica Dimka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine: X, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jessica DimkaCentre for Research on Pandemics & Society, Oslo Metropolitan University, PO. Box 4, St. Olavs Plass, 0130 Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People with disabilities and chronic health conditions are at higher risk of poor outcomes to COVID-19, yet may have lower rates of vaccination due to differences in prioritization strategies, accessibility issues, vaccine hesitancy, and other factors. Survey data from Oslo are used to investigate differences in self-reported vaccine offer, uptake, and hesitancy, as well as COVID-19 infection, for individuals with self-reported medical risk factors classified as chronic health conditions or disabilities according to likely societal perceptions. Compared to participants who reported no pre-existing medical conditions, people with chronic health conditions were more likely to have a confirmed diagnosis, be offered and take the vaccine, and have lower hesitancy, while people with disabilities generally had either no differences in or less optimal outcomes. Results suggest possible biases in vaccine recommendations and raise questions about accessibility and communication strategies, with important implications for pandemic preparedness and public health communication and practice.

Indexed as

Chronic health conditionsCOVID-19DisabilitiesNorwayVaccine prioritisation

Identifiers

PMID38161989
PMCPMC10755100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.