ArticleCureus2023
Investigating the Blink Reflex Abnormality in Dry Eye Patients.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Dry eye is an ocular surface disorder caused by increased evaporation, decreased tear production, or mixed form. Tears are secreted by the lacrimal gland after lacrimal nerve stimulation connected to the facial nerve. In nerve damage, tear secretion decreases, and dry eye develops. Our aim is to investigate the presence of pathology in the facial trigeminal nerve and neuronal pathways that provide reflex connections between these nerves by measuring the blink reflex in patients with dry eyes. Methods Schirmer test and tear breakup time were performed. Tear breakup time measurement was repeated three times, and the average of three was accepted. Tear breakup time <10 seconds and Schirmer test <10 mm without local anesthesia were accepted as dry eye. Patients having traumatic corneal pathology, ectatic corneal disease, inflammatory and microbial keratitis, previous ocular surgery, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, and chronic neurological diseases were excluded. The control group was randomly formed from 42 eyes of 21 healthy volunteers. Blink reflex was measured in both groups, and the R1 and R2 responses of the two groups were compared. Written consent was obtained from the patient (or legal guardian) so that her medical data could be published. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups in R1 and R2 responses in both eyes. There was no significant difference in terms of gender between the two groups (p=0.100). The mean age in the patient group was significantly higher than in the control group (p<0.000). The mean Schirmer test in the patient group was 8.6±1.1 mm in the right eye and 8.97±1.0 mm in the left eye. Conclusion There was no central pathology observed in terms of reflex blinking in dry eye disease. However, in future studies, brainstem fiesta sequence magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be planned to evaluate central pathologies in more detail.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.