Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38161826›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Comparison of Keratometric Change Following Various Conjunctival Autografting Techniques in Pterygium Surgery.

Snigdha Sen, Anu Jain, Prerna Upadhyay, Merensoba T Imchen, Tirupati Nath, Akash Kakkar

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Snigdha SenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra, IND.
Anu JainDepartment of Ophthalmology, Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra, IND.
Prerna UpadhyayDepartment of Ophthalmology, Government Medical College, Autonomous State Medical College, Firozabad, IND.
Merensoba T ImchenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra, IND.
Tirupati NathDepartment of Ophthalmology, Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra, IND.
Akash KakkarDepartment of Ophthalmology, Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra, IND.
Sarojini Naidu Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim To compare the postoperative keratometric changes and duration of surgery for different techniques of conjunctival autografting in pterygium surgery. Methods Patients with primary pterygium attending the outpatient department and having appropriate indications for surgery were enrolled. Preoperative ophthalmic examination included visual acuity assessment, refraction, keratometry, slit lamp, and fundus evaluation. Pterygium excision surgery with conjunctival autografting was performed on all patients using one of the four different techniques, namely, sutures, fibrin glue, and the autologous blood and bridge techniques. Duration of surgery was recorded for all patients. Postoperatively, all patients were followed up on Day 1, Day 7, and Months 1, 3, and 6. Duration of surgery, keratometric changes, and recurrence rates were analyzed in all four groups. Results Sixty-eight eyes of 66 patients completed the study protocol. There was a significant reduction in astigmatism after the autologous blood graft technique (

Indexed as

autologous bloodconjunctival auto graftingfibrin gluepterygiumpterygium surgery

Identifiers

PMID38161826
PMCPMC10756329
OpenAlexW4389132562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.