ArticleCureus2023
Development and Pilot Testing of a Comprehensive Mobile Application to Assist Cell Count Determination During Peripheral Smear and Bone Marrow Examination.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- GenoTox Cell Counter: A mobile App to standardize cell counting in genotoxicity testing.Genetics and molecular biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the modern era of complete blood count analysis, manual differential count is performed whenever 'flags' are generated by an automated hematology analyzer. Traditionally, tally counters with five or eight keys are used for manual differential count. A few mobile applications are available to perform this task; however, the application features and cell representation are limited.
objectivesThe primary objective of our study was to develop an indigenous, comprehensive mobile application to assist with manual blood cell differential count. The secondary objective was to measure the usability of a newly developed application among undergraduate medical students. MATERIALS AND
methodsA new mobile application was developed using a Java development kit, Version 11.0.13 (Oracle Corporation, Austin, USA) in Android Studio Dolphin (2021.3.1) (Google, California, USA). The application content was validated by three pathologists with more than five years of experience. The app's usability was tested among 60 participants using a validated mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ). The questionnaire had 18 items covering three domains: ease of use, interface & satisfaction, and usefulness.
resultsThe newly developed application supports peripheral smear WBC differential count, platelet count, reticulocyte count, malaria parasite quantification, and bone marrow differential count. During usability testing, the app was easy to use in 95% (57/60) of participants, time-efficient in 91.7% (55/60), and helpful for healthcare practice learning in 96.7% (58/60). The total mean score was 6.11, indicating high usability.
conclusionA comprehensive mobile application to assist manual differential count with adequate cell representation was developed. The mobile application was easy to use, time-efficient, and valuable among the study participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.