ArticleCureus2023
The Segment, Slice, and 3D Print (SS3DP) Workflow of 3D Printing Eye Anatomy for Clinicians: A Proof-of-Concept Study.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
3D printing is becoming increasingly important as time passes, with the latest technologies driving innovation in many fields, including ophthalmology. However, more is needed to know how clinicians can become innovators in their daily practice without needing expert engineering knowledge of the underlying technologies. We aimed to address that shortcoming by developing a pipeline clinicians can use to 3D print. This workflow was named SS3DP: Segment, Slice, and 3D Print. It was tested by fabricating a 3D-printed eyeball. In terms of the results of this work, we observed that the segmentation process was imperfect due to the difficulty of segmenting small structures. The learning curve was steep initially, but the technique improved the more time spent on the segmentation platform. No quantitative analysis was carried out. Innovation in medicine is stifled if its leading participants, clinicians, cannot engage with it due to a lack of knowledge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.