ReviewCureus2023
Leveraging Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Regenerative Orthopedics: A Paradigm Shift in Patient Care.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Revolution or routine? Comparing AI and traditional imaging in thoracic surgery outcomes: a systematic review.Journal of medicine and life · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence-Guided Precision Orthobiologics in Musculoskeletal Conditions.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Review
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Modern Medicine: Clinical Applications, Economic Implications, and Ethical Considerations.Current pharmaceutical design · 2026Review
- Smart hybrid nanomaterials for chronic infections: microbiome-responsive and sustainable therapeutic platforms.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Multimodal AI in Biomedicine: Pioneering the Future of Biomaterials, Diagnostics, and Personalized Healthcare.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedic Care: Advancements in Bone Care and Future Directions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence (AI): A Potential Game Changer in Regenerative Orthopedics-A Scoping Review.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Machine learning and deep learning for the diagnosis and treatment of ankylosing spondylitis- a scoping review.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2024Article
- Review
- The Use of Artificial Intelligence for Orthopedic Surgical Backlogs Such as the One Following the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Narrative Review.JB & JS open accessReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) into regenerative orthopedics heralds a paradigm shift in clinical methodologies and patient management. This review article scrutinizes AI's role in augmenting diagnostic accuracy, refining predictive models, and customizing patient care in orthopedic medicine. Focusing on innovations such as KeyGene and CellNet, we illustrate AI's adeptness in navigating complex genomic datasets, cellular differentiation, and scaffold biodegradation, which are critical components of tissue engineering. Despite its transformative potential, AI's clinical adoption remains in its infancy, contending with challenges in validation, ethical oversight, and model training for clinical relevance. This review posits AI as a vital complement to human intelligence (HI), advocating for an interdisciplinary approach that merges AI's computational prowess with medical expertise to fulfill precision medicine's promise. By analyzing historical and contemporary developments in AI, from the foundational theories of McCullough and Pitts to sophisticated neural networks, the paper emphasizes the need for a synergistic alliance between AI and HI. This collaboration is imperative for improving surgical outcomes, streamlining therapeutic modalities, and enhancing the quality of patient care. Our article calls for robust interdisciplinary strategies to overcome current obstacles and harness AI's full potential in revolutionizing patient outcomes, thereby significantly contributing to the advancement of regenerative orthopedics and the broader field of scientific research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.