ArticleData in brief2024
Simulated obstructive respiratory disease dataset over increasing positive end-expiratory pressure.
Article in Data in brief, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Simulated obstructive respiratory disease dataset over increasing positive end-expiratory pressure.Data in brief · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The breathing dataset presented is collected from 20 healthy individuals at the University of Canterbury using a device to simulate the pressure and flow profiles of obstructive pulmonary disease. Specifically, the expiratory non-linear resistance, which generates the characteristic expiratory pressure-flow loop lobe seen in obstructive disease. Ethical consent for the trial was granted by the University of Canterbury Human Research Ethics Committee (Ref: HREC 2022/26/LR). Data was collected using an open-source data collection device connected to a Fisher and Paykel Healthcare SleepStyle SPSCAA CPAP. The trial was conducted at CPAP PEEP levels of 4 and 8 cmH
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.