Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38161615›Full record

ReviewAsian journal of neurosurgery2023

Dual Microscope Indocyanine Green Video Angiography and Endoscopic Review to Treat Intracranial Aneurysm: A Review of the Literature Regarding a Case.

Daniel Alejandro Vega-Moreno, Dragan Janković, Heba Azouz, Mayank Nakipuria, Yoko Kato

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asian journal of neurosurgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Daniel Alejandro Vega-MorenoNeurosurgery Department, Postgraduate Division, Faculty of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-4797-3948
Dragan JankovićNeurosurgery Department, University Hospital Mainz, Maguncia, Germany.
Heba AzouzNeurosurgery Department, Childreńs Cancer Hospital Egypt, Cairo, Egypt.
Mayank NakipuriaNeurosurgery Department, GTB Hospital, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6820-0824
Yoko KatoNeurosurgery Department, Fujita Health University Banbuntane Hotokukai Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Children Cancer Hospital · EGFujita Health University Hospital · JPGuru Teg Bahadur Hospital · INJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of the indocyanine green video angiography (ICG-VA) both endoscope and microscope has become popular in recent decades thanks to the safety, efficacy, and added value that they have provided for cerebrovascular surgery. The dual use of these technologies is considered complementary and has helped cerebrovascular surgeons in decision-making, especially for aneurysm clipping surgery; however, its use has been described for both aneurysm surgery, resection of arteriovenous malformations, or even for bypass surgeries. We conducted a review of the literature with the MeSH terms "microscope indocyanine green video angiography (mICG-VA)," "endoscopic review," AND/OR "intracranial aneurysm." A total of 97 articles that included these terms were selected after a primary review to select a total of 26 articles for the final review. We also present a case to exemplify its use, in which we use both technological tools for the description of the aneurysm, as well as for decision-making at the time of clipping and for reclipping. Both tools, both the use of the endoscope and the mICG-VA, have helped decision-making in neurovascular surgery. A considerable clip replacement rate has been described with the use of these technologies, which has helped to reduce the complications associated with poor clipping. One of the main advantages of their usefulness is that they are tools for intraoperative use, which is why they have shown superiority compared to digital subtraction angiography, which takes longer to use and has a higher risk of complications associated with the contrast medium. On the other hand, a very low rate of complications has been described with the use of the endoscope and mICG-VA, which is why they are considered safe tools to use. In some cases, mention has been made of the use of one or the other technology; however, we consider that its dual use provides more information about the status of the clip, its anatomy, its relationship with other vascular structures, and the complete occlusion of the aneurysm. We consider that the use of both technologies is complementary, so in case of having them both should be used, since both the endoscope and the mICG-VA provide additional and useful information.

Indexed as

aneurysm clippingcerebrovascular surgeryendoscopic reviewintracranial aneurysmmicroscope indocyanine green video angiography

Identifiers

PMID38161615
PMCPMC10756820
OpenAlexW4389208815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.