Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38161547›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Efficacy and Safety of Mepolizumab in the Management of Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: A Systematic Review.

Ibrahim M Dighriri, Anas I Alnughaythir, Amna A Albesisi, Danya I Alhuwaimel, Alanoud S Alotaibi, Laila A Alghowaidi, Fatimah H Almalki, Jasmine N Al-Bukhari, Tahani R Alshammari, Fahad H Alwathnani and 5 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 6 countries.

Ibrahim M DighririDepartment of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz Specialist Hospital, Taif, SAU.
Anas I AlnughaythirDepartment of Pharmacy, Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh, SAU.
Amna A AlbesisiDepartment of Pharmacy, East Jeddah Hospital, Jeddah, SAU.
Danya I AlhuwaimelDepartment of Pharmacy, Alrass General Hospital, Alrass, SAU.
Alanoud S AlotaibiDepartment of Pharmacy, United Pharmacy, Taif, SAU.
Laila A Alghowaidi‏Faculty of Pharmacy, Taif University, Taif, SAU.
Fatimah H AlmalkiDepartment of Pharmacy, Jazan General Hospital, Jazan, SAU.
Jasmine N Al-BukhariFaculty of Pharmacy, Taif University, Taif, SAU.
Tahani R AlshammariDepartment of Pharmacy, King Salman Specialist Hospital, Hail, SAU.
Fahad H AlwathnaniDepartment of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz Specialist Hospital, Taif, SAU.
Abdulmohsen A AlghamdiDepartment of Pharmacy, Prince Mishari Bin Saud Hospital, Baljurashi, SAU.
Ali A AlghamdiDepartment of Pharmacy, Prince Mishari Bin Saud Hospital, Baljurashi, SAU.
Safar D AlshehriDepartment of Pharmacy, King Abdullah Hospital, Bisha, SAU.
Nora Y MahnashiDepartment of Community Pharmacy, Al-Amal Hospital, Jazan, SAU.
Hassan A Abu JamilahPharmaceutical Care Administration, Sharurah Armed Forces Hospital, Sharurah, SAU.
Taif University · SAInstituto de Saúde · BRKing Abdulaziz Hospital · SAGeneral University Hospital of Patras · GRJazan University · SAKing Abdullah University Hospital · JOKing Fahad Specialist Hospital · SANational Center for Cancer Care and Research · QASecurity Forces Hospital · SAShatin Hospital · CNUniversity of Jeddah · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) is characterized by persistent airway inflammation and frequent exacerbations despite standard treatments. Mepolizumab, a monoclonal antibody that reduces eosinophil levels by targeting interleukin-5, has emerged as an add-on therapy for patients with SEA. This systematic review evaluated mepolizumab's efficacy and safety for treating SEA. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across major databases. Thirty-two studies with over 6,000 patients were included, comprising randomized controlled trials, open-label extensions, and real-world observational analyses. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed using standard tools. Meta-analysis was deemed inappropriate due to heterogeneity. Instead, a narrative synthesis was performed. Mepolizumab significantly reduced exacerbation rates by around 50% and improved symptoms and lung function compared to placebo in pivotal trials. Long-term open-label studies showed sustained reductions in exacerbations and stable lung function for up to 4.5 years. Real-world data demonstrated consistent 50%-90% exacerbation decreases across diverse patient populations over 6-24 months. Mepolizumab exhibited an acceptable safety profile, with mild injection site reactions and headaches as most common adverse events. While specific subgroups may show enhanced responses, mepolizumab displayed broad efficacy regardless of patient demographics or phenotypes. The extensive evidence provides robust support for mepolizumab as an efficacious and safe add-on treatment option for patients with severe, refractory eosinophilic asthma. Further high-quality comparative effectiveness research is warranted to optimize patient selection and positioning among emerging biologics.

Indexed as

efficacyeosinophilic asthmamepolizumabsafetysever asthma

Identifiers

PMID38161547
PMCPMC10757760
OpenAlexW4389224965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.