ArticleJournal of clinical and translational hepatology2023
Expert Consensus on Pathological Diagnosis of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma (2022 version).
Article in Journal of clinical and translational hepatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging omics diagnosis of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.Journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Refinement of histologic subtypes and identification of biomarkers linked to unfavorable prognosis in cholangiocarcinoma: The ENSCCA registries' framework for digital twin advancement.Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2026Article
- ATP-binding Cassette Transporter Defects and Their Roles in Hepatic Diseases.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2026Review
- Advances in Multi-Omics Research on Biomarkers of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Molecular and Histological Profiles and Relevant Imaging Signatures of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2025Review
- High-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score (HS-mGPS) is a prognostic biomarker for small duct-type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma-a retrospective cohort study.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Immunohistochemistry in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: histological subtyping and drug selection.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- LARP3 inhibits the apoptosis of hepatocellular carcinoma via the ROS/PI3K/c-Fos axis.PloS one · 2025Article
- Clinicopathological features of cholangiolocarcinoma and impact of tumor heterogeneity on prognosis: A single institution retrospective study.Oncology letters · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
48 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) can originate from the large bile duct group (segment bile ducts and area bile ducts), small bile duct group (septal bile ducts and interlobular bile ducts), and terminal bile duct group (bile ductules and canals of Hering) of the intrahepatic biliary tree, which can be histopathological corresponding to large duct type iCCA, small duct type iCCA and iCCA with ductal plate malformation pattern, and cholangiolocarcinoma, respectively. The challenge in pathological diagnosis of above subtypes of iCCA falls in the distinction of cellular morphologies, tissue structures, growth patterns, invasive behaviors, immunophenotypes, molecular mutations, and surgical prognoses. For these reasons, this expert consensus provides nine recommendations as a reference for standardizing and refining the diagnosis of pathological subtypes of iCCA, mainly based on the 5
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.