ArticleiScience2024
Multimodal processing of noisy cues in bumblebees.
Article in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scent rhythms in twilight-floweringAoB PLANTS · 2026Article
- Bees flexibly adjust decision strategies to information content in a foraging task.Science advances · 2026Article
- Honey Bee Foraging Decisions Are Shaped by Floral Trait Distinctiveness and Perception of Gains or Losses.Insects · 2025Article
- Many ways for sensory systems to stumble and fail in the Anthropocene.Journal of biosciences · 2025Article
- Cognitive tasks could be biased towards generalists: a lesson from wild non-eusocial bees.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral EcologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multimodal cues can improve behavioral responses by enhancing the detection and localization of sensory cues and reducing response times. Across species, studies have shown that multisensory integration of visual and olfactory cues can improve response accuracy. However, in real-world settings, sensory cues are often noisy; visual and olfactory cues can be deteriorated, masked, or mixed, making the target cue less clear to the receiver. In this study, we use an associative learning paradigm (Free Moving Proboscis Extension Reflex, FMPER) to show that having multimodal cues may improve the accuracy of bees' responses to noisy cues. Adding a noisy visual cue improves the accuracy of response to a noisy olfactory cue, despite neither the clear nor noisy visual cue being sufficient when paired with a novel olfactory cue. This may provide insight into the neural mechanisms underlying multimodal processing and the effects of environmental change on pollination services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.