Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38161203›Full record

ReviewLight, science & applications2024

On the use of deep learning for phase recovery.

Kaiqiang Wang, Li Song, Chutian Wang, Zhenbo Ren, Guangyuan Zhao, Jiazhen Dou, Jianglei Di, George Barbastathis, Renjie Zhou, Jianlin Zhao and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Light, science & applications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Ultrafast Dynamic Defect Inspection With Computational Neuromorphic Imaging.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Descattering and image restoration with a transformer-based neural network in deep tissue imaging.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kaiqiang WangDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. kqwang.optics@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4146-2431
Li SongDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Chutian WangDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Zhenbo RenSchool of Physical Science and Technology, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China.
Guangyuan ZhaoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Jiazhen DouSchool of Information Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Jianglei DiSchool of Information Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
George BarbastathisDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Renjie ZhouDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4761-6641
Jianlin ZhaoSchool of Physical Science and Technology, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China. jlzhao@nwpu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4619-1215
Edmund Y LamDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. elam@eee.hku.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6268-950X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phase recovery (PR) refers to calculating the phase of the light field from its intensity measurements. As exemplified from quantitative phase imaging and coherent diffraction imaging to adaptive optics, PR is essential for reconstructing the refractive index distribution or topography of an object and correcting the aberration of an imaging system. In recent years, deep learning (DL), often implemented through deep neural networks, has provided unprecedented support for computational imaging, leading to more efficient solutions for various PR problems. In this review, we first briefly introduce conventional methods for PR. Then, we review how DL provides support for PR from the following three stages, namely, pre-processing, in-processing, and post-processing. We also review how DL is used in phase image processing. Finally, we summarize the work in DL for PR and provide an outlook on how to better use DL to improve the reliability and efficiency of PR. Furthermore, we present a live-updating resource ( https://github.com/kqwang/phase-recovery ) for readers to learn more about PR.

Identifiers

PMID38161203
PMCPMC10758000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.