Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38161200›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2024

Defining the Biology of Estrogen Receptor-Low-Positive Breast Cancer.

Tessa Higgins, Olga Kantor, Beth Harrison, Julia Giordano, Monica McGrath, Harold J Burstein, Stuart J Schnitt, Tasnim Rahman, Halley Vora, Ana Garrido-Castro and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Impact of anthracyclines in genomic high-risk, node-negative, HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Tessa HigginsDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Olga KantorDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Beth HarrisonBreast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Julia GiordanoDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Monica McGrathDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Harold J BursteinBreast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Stuart J SchnittBreast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Tasnim RahmanBreast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Halley VoraDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Ana Garrido-CastroBreast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Sara M TolaneyBreast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Funda Meric-BernstamDepartment of Investigational Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Tari A KingDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Elizabeth A MittendorfDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. emittendorf@bwh.harvard.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe sought to better define estrogen receptor-low-positive (ER-low+) breast cancer biology and determine the utility of the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score

methodsPatients with information regarding percentage ER positivity and PAM50 subtype were identified in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and subtype distribution was determined. Next, patients with ER-low+ (ER 1-10%), HER2- breast cancer undergoing upfront surgery with known RS result were identified in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and our institutional Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center (DF/BCC) database; RS distribution was examined. Finally, patients with ER-low+, HER2- breast cancer treated at DF/BCC from 2011 to 2020 without prior RS results and in whom tissue was available to perform the assay were identified. RS results, treatment, recurrence and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were determined.

resultsOf 1033 patients in TCGA, ER percentage and PAM50 subtype were available for 342 (33.1%) patients. Forty-six (13.5%) had ER-low+/HER2- tumors, among whom 82.6% were basal and 4.3% were luminal A. Among 3423 patients with ER-low+/HER2- disease in the NCDB, RS results were available for 689 (20.1%) patients; 67% had an RS ≥26. In our institutional database, only two patients with ER-low+/HER2- disease and an RS were identified, both with RS ≥26. Among 37 patients in our institutional cohort without prior RS, 35 (97.4%) had an RS ≥26, determined with testing. After a median follow-up of 40 months (range 3-106), three patients, all treated with chemotherapy, recurred. Three-year BCSS was 97.0% (95% confidence interval 96.9-97.1%).

conclusionsMost ER-low+/HER2- breast cancers are basal-like, with RS ≥26 suggesting these tumors are similar to triple-negative disease.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalReceptors, EstrogenErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenBreast cancerChemotherapyEndocrine therapyEstrogen receptor-low-positiveGenomic assayOncotype DX Breast Recurrence score

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.