Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38160505›Full record

ArticleJournal of fluency disorders2024

Brain response to errors in children who stutter.

Yanni Liu, Amanda Hampton Wray, Melissa Hall, Erica R Lescht, William J Gehring, Kate D Fitzgerald, Soo-Eun Chang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of fluency disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Yanni LiuDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: yanniliu@umich.edu.
Amanda Hampton WrayDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Melissa HallDepartment of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
Erica R LeschtDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
William J GehringDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Kate D FitzgeraldColumbia University/New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.
Soo-Eun ChangDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Communication Disorders, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea.
University of Michigan · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USEwha Womans University · KRNew York State Psychiatric InstituteUniversity of Notre Dame · US

Funding

Sexual dimorphism of neural development underlying childhood stutteringR01DC011277 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Soo-Eun Chang · 2010 to 2026
$8.2M
Neural oscillations underlying speech perception and production in childhood stutteringR01DC018283 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHANG, SOO-EUN · 2020 to 2024
$2.3M
Supplement to Attentional control in children who stutterR21DC017227 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HAMPTON WRAY, AMANDA M · 2018 to 2021
$501k
Psychoglogical and Neurophysiological Risk Markers of Persistent Stuttering in Early DevelopmentR21DC016681 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LIU, YANNI · 2017 to 2019
$467k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011277NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018283NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC016681NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC017227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHeightened rates of social anxiety have been reported in adults who stutter (AWS), but it is unclear whether anxiety is heightened also in children who stutter (CWS). Objective neurophysiological responses such as the error-related negativity (ERN) have been associated with anxiety, and ERN was reported to be increased in AWS. In this study, we examined whether ERN and error positivity (Pe) are increased in CWS. We further characterized ERN associations with age and anxiety in CWS relative to children who do not stutter (CWNS).

methodsEEG data were recorded from twenty-four CWS and twenty-four matched CWNS aged 3-9 years as they performed a Go/No-Go task. Parent-reported anxiety, and child-reported speech-associated attitude measures were collected. Linear regression models tested the effects of age, group, and their interaction, and the effects of anxiety, group, and their interaction on ERN and Pe.

resultsContrary to expectations, no ERN or Pe difference were observed between CWS and CWNS. However, larger ERN amplitudes were associated with older age in CWS but not CWNS, suggesting altered development of the error monitoring system in CWS. Association of Pe with anxiety also differed between groups: smaller Pe amplitudes were associated with higher level of parent-reported child anxiety in CWNS but not in CWS. Neither anxiety nor self-reported communication attitude differed between groups.

conclusionsBrain responses to errors were overall comparable between CWS and CWNS. However, CWS differed in how error monitoring responses varied with age and with anxiety levels. More research is warranted to examine how these factors contribute to persistent stuttering.

Indexed as

StutteringAdultAnxietyBrainCommunicationHumansSpeechEEGError monitoringStuttering

Identifiers

PMID38160505
PMCPMC10939925
OpenAlexW4390277917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.