Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38160272›Full record

ArticlePacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing2024

SynTwin: A graph-based approach for predicting clinical outcomes using digital twins derived from synthetic patients.

Jason H Moore, Xi Li, Jui-Hsuan Chang, Nicholas P Tatonetti, Dan Theodorescu, Yong Chen, Folkert W Asselbergs, Mythreye Venkatesan, Zhiping Paul Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Current progress of digital twin construction using medical imaging.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jason H MooreDepartment of Computational Biomedicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, CA, United States2Cedars-Sinai Cancer, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States, jason.moore@csmc.edu.
Xi Li
Jui-Hsuan Chang
Nicholas P Tatonetti
Dan Theodorescu
Yong Chen
Folkert W Asselbergs
Mythreye Venkatesan
Zhiping Paul Wang

Funding

Artificial Intelligence Strategies for Alzheimer's Disease ResearchU01AG066833 · NIA · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI MOORE, JASON H., RITCHIE, MARYLYN D · 2022 to 2025
$6.7M
Bioinformatics Strategies for Genome-Wide Association StudiesR01LM010098 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MOORE, JASON H., WILLIAMS, SCOTT MATTHEW · 2009 to 2023
$5.1M
Precision Pharmacology and Pharmacovigilance: Leveraging AI to address drug safety knowledge gapsR35GM131905 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Nicholas P Tatonetti · 2019 to 2026
$3.3M
Artificial Intelligence Strategies for Alzheimer's Disease ResearchR01AG066833 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MOORE, JASON H., RITCHIE, MARYLYN D · 2021 to 2021
$1.6M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG066833NIA NIH HHS U01 AG066833NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM131905NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of a digital twin came from the engineering, industrial, and manufacturing domains to create virtual objects or machines that could inform the design and development of real objects. This idea is appealing for precision medicine where digital twins of patients could help inform healthcare decisions. We have developed a methodology for generating and using digital twins for clinical outcome prediction. We introduce a new approach that combines synthetic data and network science to create digital twins (i.e. SynTwin) for precision medicine. First, our approach starts by estimating the distance between all subjects based on their available features. Second, the distances are used to construct a network with subjects as nodes and edges defining distance less than the percolation threshold. Third, communities or cliques of subjects are defined. Fourth, a large population of synthetic patients are generated using a synthetic data generation algorithm that models the correlation structure of the data to generate new patients. Fifth, digital twins are selected from the synthetic patient population that are within a given distance defining a subject community in the network. Finally, we compare and contrast community-based prediction of clinical endpoints using real subjects, digital twins, or both within and outside of the community. Key to this approach are the digital twins defined using patient similarity that represent hypothetical unobserved patients with patterns similar to nearby real patients as defined by network distance and community structure. We apply our SynTwin approach to predicting mortality in a population-based cancer registry (n=87,674) from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program from the National Cancer Institute (USA). Our results demonstrate that nearest network neighbor prediction of mortality in this study is significantly improved with digital twins (AUROC=0.864, 95% CI=0.857-0.872) over just using real data alone (AUROC=0.791, 95% CI=0.781-0.800). These results suggest a network-based digital twin strategy using synthetic patients may add value to precision medicine efforts.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputational BiologyCluster AnalysisHumansPrecision Medicine

Identifiers

PMID38160272
PMCPMC10827004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.