Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38160251›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2023

Generation of a Predictive Clinical Model for Isolated Distal Deep Vein Thrombosis (ICMVT) Detection.

Yan Xu, Mingmin Xu, Xiaofang Zheng, Fengxia Jin, Bin Meng

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diagnostic Efficacy of Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse in Staging of Lower Limb Intramuscular Venous Thrombosis: A Single-Center Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yan XuDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhejiang Rongjun Hospital, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, China (mainland).
Mingmin XuDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhejiang Rongjun Hospital, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, China (mainland).
Xiaofang ZhengDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhejiang Rongjun Hospital, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, China (mainland).
Fengxia JinDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhejiang Rongjun Hospital, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, China (mainland).
Bin MengDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhejiang Rongjun Hospital, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, China (mainland).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (ICMVT) increases the risk of pulmonary embolism. Although predictive models are available, their utility in predicting the risk is unknown. To develop a clinical prediction model for isolated distal calf muscle venous thrombosis, data from 462 patients were used to assess the independent risk variables for ICMVT. MATERIAL AND METHODS The area under curve (AUC) for Model A and Model B were calculated and other risk factors were based on age, pitting edema in the symptomatic leg, calf swelling with least 3 cm larger than the asymptomatic leg, recent bed rest for 3 days or more in the past 4 weeks, requiring general or major surgery with regional anesthesia, sex, and local tenderness distributed along the deep venous system as independent predictors of calf muscle venous thrombosis. Model A includes the risk variables for C-reactive protein and D-dimer. RESULTS The area under ROC curve for Model A training set was 0.924 (95% CI: 0.895-0.952), the area under ROC curve for Model B training set was 0.887 (95% CI: 0.852-0.922), and the AUC difference between the 2 models was statistically significant (P<0.001); the area under ROC curve for Model A obtained in the validation set was 0.902 (95% CI: 0.844-0.961), the area under ROC curve for Model B was 0.842 (95% CI: 0. 0.773-0.910), and the difference between the 2 models was statistically significant (P=0.012). CONCLUSIONS Predictive Model A better predicts isolated calf muscle venous thrombosis and is able to help clinicians rapidly and early diagnose ICMVT, displaying higher utility for missed diagnosis prevention and disease therapy.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalVenous ThrombosisHumansInfant, NewbornLegPrognosisRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID38160251
PMCPMC10765549
OpenAlexW4388861384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.