Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38160045›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry2024

Cognitive trajectory in the first year after first-ever ischaemic stroke in young adults: the ODYSSEY study.

Mijntje M I Schellekens, Ravi C S Springer, Esther M Boot, Jamie I Verhoeven, Merel S Ekker, Mayte E van Alebeek, Paul J A M Brouwers, Renate M Arntz, Gert W van Dijk, Rob A R Gons and 16 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Young stroke: An update on epidemiology, emerging risk factors, and future research directions.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 15 institutions in 1 country.

Mijntje M I SchellekensNeurology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8757-619X
Ravi C S SpringerNeurology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Esther M BootNeurology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5561-9869
Jamie I VerhoevenNeurology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Merel S EkkerNeurology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6598-2218
Mayte E van AlebeekNeurology, Gelre Hospitals, Zutphen, The Netherlands.
Paul J A M BrouwersNeurology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Renate M ArntzNeurology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Gert W van DijkNeurology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Rob A R GonsNeurology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Inge W M van UdenNeurology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Tom den HeijerNeurology, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Julia H van TuijlNeurology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Karlijn F de LaatNeurology, Haga Hospital, Den Haag, The Netherlands.
Anouk G W van NordenNeurology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
Sarah E VermeerNeurology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Marian S G van ZagtenNeurology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
Robert J Van OostenbruggeNeurology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Marieke J H WermerNeurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Paul J NederkoornNeurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Frank G van RooijNeurology, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2411-1915
Ido R van den WijngaardDepartment of Neurology, Medical Centre Haaglanden, Den Haag, The Netherlands.
Paul L M de KortNeurology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Frank-Erik De LeeuwNeurology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Roy P C KesselsRadboud University Donders Institute for Brain Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Anil M TuladharNeurology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Anil.Tuladhar@radboudumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-4815-2834
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLElisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis · NLMedisch Spectrum Twente · NLAmphia Ziekenhuis · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLCanisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis · NLGelre Hospitals · NLHaga Hospital · NLJeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLMedisch Centrum Haaglanden · NLMedisch Centrum Leeuwarden · NLRijnstate Hospital · NLSint Franciscus Gasthuis · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLimited data exists on cognitive recovery in young stroke patients. We aimed to investigate the longitudinal course of cognitive performance during the first year after stroke at young age and identify predictors for cognitive recovery.

methodsWe conducted a multicentre prospective cohort study between 2013 and 2021, enrolling patients aged 18-49 years with first-ever ischaemic stroke. Cognitive assessments were performed within 6 months and after 1 year following the index event, covering seven cognitive domains. Composite Z-scores using normative data determined cognitive impairment (Z-score<-1.5). A Reliable Change Index (RCI) assessed cognitive recovery (RCI>1.96) or decline (RCI<-1.96).

results393 patients (median age 44.3 years, IQR 38.4-47.2) completed cognitive assessments with a median time interval of 403 days (IQR 364-474) between assessments. Based on RCI, a similar proportion of patients showed improvement and decline in each cognitive domain, while the majority exhibited no cognitive change. Among cognitively impaired patients at baseline, improvements were observed in processing speed (23.1%), visuoconstruction (40.1%) and executive functioning (20.0%). Younger age was associated with better cognitive recovery in visuoconstruction, and larger lesion volume was related to cognitive recovery in processing speed. No other predictors for cognitive recovery were identified.

conclusionsCognitive impairment remains prevalent in young stroke even 1 year after the event. Most patients showed no cognitive change, however, recovery may have occurred in the early weeks after stroke, which was not assessed in our study. Among initially cognitively impaired patients, cognitive recovery is observed in processing speed, visuoconstruction and executive functioning. It is still not possible to predict cognitive recovery in individual patients.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionIschemic StrokeAdolescentAdultAge FactorsCognitionExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsProspective StudiesRecovery of FunctionYoung AdultCOGNITIONSTROKE

Identifiers

PMID38160045
PMCPMC11103341
OpenAlexW4390439407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.