Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38159941›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with Pilates-based exercises in the treatment of chronic low back pain in outpatient rehabilitation service in Brazil: double-blind randomised controlled trial protocol.

Aleilson Abner Câmara da Silva, Sâmara Raquel Alves Gomes, Rayssa Maria do Nascimento, Adna Karolinne Fonseca, Rodrigo Pegado, Clécio Gabriel Souza, Liane de Brito Macedo

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05467566 (The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined With Pilates Based Exercise in the Treatment of Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05467566 naunknown statusnot on this map

The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined With Pilates Based Exercise in the Treatment of Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do NorteRan2022 to 2023Enrolled42ConditionsLow Back Pain, Transcranial Direct Current StimulationArmsTranscranial direct current stimulation, Sham Transcranial direct current stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aleilson Abner Câmara da SilvaFaculty of Health Sciences of Trairi, Post Graduation Program in Rehabilitation Science, UFRN, Santa Cruz, Brazil.
Sâmara Raquel Alves GomesPost graduate Program in Physical Therapy, UFRN, Natal, Brazil.
Rayssa Maria do NascimentoFaculty of Health Sciences of Trairi, UFRN, Santa Cruz, Brazil.
Adna Karolinne FonsecaFaculty of Health Sciences of Trairi, UFRN, Santa Cruz, Brazil.
Rodrigo PegadoGraduate Program in Health Sciences. Graduate Program in Physical Therapy, UFRN, Natal, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7227-1075
Clécio Gabriel SouzaFaculty of Health Sciences of Trairi, Post Graduation Program in Rehabilitation Science, UFRN, Santa Cruz, Brazil.
Liane de Brito MacedoFaculty of Health Sciences of Trairi, Post Graduation Program in Rehabilitation Science, UFRN, Santa Cruz, Brazil liane.macedo@ufrn.br.ORCID 0000-0001-5378-2390
Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChronic low back pain may be associated with pathoanatomical, neurophysiological, physical, psychological and social factors; thus, treatments to reduce symptoms are important to improve the quality of life of this population. We aimed to evaluate the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with Pilates-based exercises compared with sham stimulation on pain, quality of life and disability in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a protocol for a double-blind randomised controlled trial with participants, outcome assessor and statistician blinded. We will include 36 individuals with a history of non-specific chronic low back pain for more than 12 weeks and minimum pain intensity of 3 points on the Numerical Pain Rating Scale. Individuals will be randomised into two groups: (1) active tDCS combined with Pilates-based exercises and (2) sham tDCS combined with Pilates-based exercises. Three weekly sessions of the protocol will be provided for 4 weeks, and individuals will be submitted to three assessments: the first (T0) will be performed before the intervention protocol, the second (T1) immediately after the intervention protocol and the third (T2) will be a follow-up 1 month after the end of the intervention. We will assess pain, disability, central sensitisation, quality of life, pressure pain threshold, global impression of change, adverse events and medication use. The Numerical Pain Rating Scale and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire will be used at T1 to assess pain and disability, respectively, as primary outcome measures. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial was prospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov website and ethically approved by the Ethics and Research Committee of the Faculty of Health Sciences of Trairi (report number: 5.411.244) before data collection. We will publish the results in a peer-reviewed medical journal and on institution websites. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05467566).

Indexed as

Chronic PainExercise Movement TechniquesLow Back PainTranscranial Direct Current StimulationBrazilDouble-Blind MethodHumansOutpatientsQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeBack painChronic PainPAIN MANAGEMENTPhysical Therapy ModalitiesSpine

Identifiers

PMID38159941
PMCPMC10759071
OpenAlexW4390452499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.